Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/zSvv5yvpzFxmNHdhE3qjrL1HamA/
2967199
1926578
Re: [v6ops] [EXTERNAL] Re: Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]Re: [v6ops] [EXTERNAL] Re: Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]
Templin (US), Fred L
2020-11-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/UHAP3pg0o4pRF33YrtSE9TWosJI/
2967178
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Mark Smith
2020-11-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/uuMpVema6dKD_Yjfqr4m0zYifgI/
2967113
1926578
Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]
Joel M. Halpern
2020-11-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/qd2w0To2HjjqZu2zpbTwxz88REo/
2967070
1926578
Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]
Joel M. Halpern
2020-11-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/AXVtVsvjLfvHMuyDAgSnWcuwL5I/
2967067
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Alexandre Petrescu
2020-11-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/7Ej3zXkymOpJyNsiYlhfpRXuB1g/
2967061
1926578
Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]
Mark Smith
2020-11-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/YFUFPe2inxKoX0NtLGu34bbVEiI/
2967059
1926578
Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]
Ole Troan
2020-11-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/Y0U27CDsQ_-u1r9rrvTorjZEkYY/
2967052
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gert Doering
2020-11-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/AQr0U5liFSlmFec70NDK8NA9KQU/
2967045
1926578
Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]
Ca By
2020-11-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/K_Y7wZ20Plg5cz-L1zi4YBRataE/
2967034
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Mark Smith
2020-11-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/-RxB_LZljF0stq4fBbsCi4ymc9c/
2967031
1926578
Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]
Mark Smith
2020-11-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/L-qYdz_htyEY2KD8UdZaSST6vbc/
2967018
1926578
[v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112][v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]
Brian E Carpenter
2020-11-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/m2G0yQpoLFsfM95_b9WGUp3N0pw/
2967015
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Joel M. Halpern
2020-11-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/ta7-CYAiHwP4Gs0dgkwao9NRrFE/
2967010
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/mFch38gkWuzzhpVeyyWLAQ-XIsM/
2967000
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/Mjyq16WxIU54-pYM1wSFIKCRT2c/
2966996
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Joel M. Halpern
2020-11-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/AqcjlM1c91smf5x9lZ5uCR1wYV4/
2966964
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Ole Troan
2020-11-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/iHgEuTzt-q3_ycex2Y2fPZtwKQI/
2966955
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/Ainp0ddIuvaqsbIT96A67SI75q8/
2966947
1926578
Re: [v6ops] Flow Label Load BalancingRe: [v6ops] Flow Label Load Balancing
Alexander Azimov
2020-11-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/hzoCTsHDkWSHmGg2TYQlYXSMqcM/
2966690
1926570
Re: [v6ops] Followup from Ietf 109 v6ops meetingRe: [v6ops] Followup from Ietf 109 v6ops meeting
Fred Baker
2020-11-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/oLPCFdhVoL5f7apixpeKdIY69II/
2966689
1926803
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112
Bob Hinden
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/EOAe33FoNqvpLrGdAd9oALNAP4U/
2966374
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112
Brian E Carpenter
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/bVtBWhGaju_LzT-DfYiLDp8PFMQ/
2966362
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Joel M. Halpern
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/VGbC6B4VKFiekV0ZacMuHlMEIbU/
2966349
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/_njNMQRii3qZp8MRa6QWrprYpsk/
2966346
1926578
Re: [v6ops] Flow Label Load BalancingRe: [v6ops] Flow Label Load Balancing
Tom Herbert
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/MMmU5nmty9K38T3MdrPROt32SNY/
2966204
1926570
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
otroan
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/mcMHmXxRPo3GADsJIDINmqShx7o/
2966202
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/jzPhOIUFx5ERUMdUUGbe2TBw4C0/
2966193
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/ZJID1cCBljwKgxSJay-EYiRFVwI/
2966177
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/99on3D1ZWo1VY-Rospu4zgKEFH8/
2966174
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Alexandre Petrescu
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/SpK7B69yNajPwA9jjU6c7mkXDpk/
2966160
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gert Doering
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/AG09lrK41Ki8KUgRGf6jQqUpbLY/
2966150
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/e8T9fI9XshCa4yXtZJB2Xc6LsJY/
2966147
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/rn7kWnEc_UG2VjMWacE0-nx9D3M/
2966140
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
otroan
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/3hXcu-4ErdNhtoDXjSeCIJcHg90/
2966137
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/1OhHmnJtQKZ2Alc4Y7yQeRmibbk/
2966132
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/aNqAPmuAC9x1rAW5MIRIOGXCp68/
2966117
1926578
[v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso[v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/ELIqTXW7wRUlyvW8Na1Q78qEsRo/
2966103
1926578
[v6ops] Flow Label Load Balancing[v6ops] Flow Label Load Balancing
Alexander Azimov
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/V9ZljDjcqKVraHouhwsOWNxHcmU/
2966071
1926570
Re: [v6ops] 6MAN Agenda for IETF 109Re: [v6ops] 6MAN Agenda for IETF 109
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-17
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/2ytA9ZgzRvphI9Od7Xs1n6_ySpw/
2964356
1924810