IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6tisch] [6tisch-security] proposed security text for architecture draft

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 12 November 2014 20:53 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4D51A88B0; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 12:53:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.495
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.495 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3FF8YmvS8E-s; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 12:53:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D1871A870C; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 12:53:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B78E2016A; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:55:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 8E5D4637F4; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:53:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771C0637F2; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:53:09 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD848A4DCB4@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
References: <20507.1415811045@sandelman.ca> <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD848A4DCB4@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:53:09 -0500
Message-ID: <3419.1415825589@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/jwWxW18HL_TlNqRsJ4V9-ch4ifY
Cc: "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>, "6tisch-security@ietf.org" <6tisch-security@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] [6tisch-security] proposed security text for architecture draft
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 20:53:13 -0000

Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:
    > For the initial connection to the join assistant, we said that we'd use
    > a well-known key by default, following René's initial
    > recommendation. At some point of time, we also discussed the
    > possibility to override that key by configuration to allow to
    > differentiate networks, making that key effectively a sort of ssid.

I'll fix the text to include these points, which I agree that we said.

-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email