Re: [76attendees] A Net Neutrality comment

"Dale Worley" <dworley@nortel.com> Mon, 09 November 2009 04:43 UTC

Return-Path: <dworley@nortel.com>
X-Original-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 729EB28C14C for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 20:43:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.562
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.562 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OWuru3wJ5C5u for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 20:43:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zcars04e.nortel.com (zcars04e.nortel.com [47.129.242.56]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A6C73A679F for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 20:43:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com (zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com [47.140.202.46]) by zcars04e.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.0/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id nA94hJN13804; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 04:43:19 GMT
Received: from [47.141.31.138] ([47.141.31.138]) by zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 8 Nov 2009 23:43:18 -0500
From: "Dale Worley" <dworley@nortel.com>
To: Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <88ac5c710911081705o911a7abx7b2ef43655bb848@mail.gmail.com>
References: <94C0E9F1-94A4-4C04-A236-37909CF10CBE@cisco.com> <F653BB99-4B19-4573-BBC2-629683A4DDB2@fugue.com> <0E896617-85A1-4DD0-8290-810C8E5F8463@cisco.com> <2E6BC2D3-70F6-4FB5-807A-FB10E3EBD8EC@fugue.com> <88ac5c710911081705o911a7abx7b2ef43655bb848@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Nortel Networks
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:43:15 -0500
Message-Id: <1257741795.4458.2.camel@khone.us.nortel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-5.fc8)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Nov 2009 04:43:19.0456 (UTC) FILETIME=[29006200:01CA60F7]
Cc: 76attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [76attendees] A Net Neutrality comment
X-BeenThere: 76attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <76attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/76attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:76attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 04:43:12 -0000

On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 10:05 +0900, Richard Barnes wrote:
> If the other viewpoint is "militant libertarian", is this "militant
> fascist"?  (Corporatist?  ISPist?)

An ideology called "ISPism" has a nice ring to it!

Dale