Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime?
Matt Mathis <mattmathis@google.com> Sat, 25 July 2015 01:06 UTC
Return-Path: <mattmathis@google.com>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B11961B2A6B for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 18:06:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lp7_DkHfgPbz for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 18:06:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x235.google.com (mail-ig0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 081B41B2A68 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 18:06:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by igbpg9 with SMTP id pg9so46302762igb.0 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 18:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=nERNjuU0+ONsL7EpiGecjiAHuexSa305NhK62Ygi8fI=; b=FlGYsotvYb4jg5HVBOtqSwJLeF69nJTJmU8vfO/n9eZPcreRUrTU8ZrmPtVKr3GrpZ pF8oIHxKd0NkLXMmLggIid0OL3gfbY/99anxdRdjwXDHCX+MkD+lJIvYsQfVK3OIviIk D21mlEry4LFkFEc07+xvfQlCUfuaJoH/WyF0gE103qnrbRUQet8/ftgJ0gdu9iI5yRW5 op9WgnFLG2gV1mk1v4qtYVY0BSy9uQj5n4IaTFYU3RjdiN0to3mYTvby+i4ytbPu5Sxn z71iniJl220Rq5uB7UL8LWw04FcqDZ9XkV8InczO9Knw6Ytw5zu2f+Oo9sNicYy8Nxmf fqKQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=nERNjuU0+ONsL7EpiGecjiAHuexSa305NhK62Ygi8fI=; b=LzAIapNSGrqXoU0+4Jd/fbw+4h2WwOsPlKtC1NYdiEzVHtpwreA/UGJ7xMt6iVYrM1 3jo+zDACKn7JmlujPbyByMLCvf6SnKtyTO2I2bmtSYqrTQtfUkFFL4tWhJWzz7mM5kAf a0B5KQjFiYiwdlyowWqge/+KFETb1DUZ10fJpSMcErCQfGK8Vsrtcmt/z65nTRooBu43 ki6PGeEPTW32S5wF87VGhK05xcxiZ+DrAHAR3i02UbqSasGcydRO7SgdRJp8CCNo0Qct iCqIdkCoNu/+ftJZ59y3SKVKtxd1GWyBdoZMmqXuprxilj4cqZI9PYRucMDQ+aeqGx5C gFlQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmKTS+zvU1OIZTKYQoAAmS3dyw5MJkAnU2sfMVkFaGgkB7OAIraY2RH6EIRIh0NG9aGqgdj
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.138.152 with SMTP id c24mr25805363ioj.74.1437786385342; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 18:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.93.100 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 18:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2D717D4A-4738-4CB0-B62E-A506EDD88EB1@verisign.com>
References: <CAD62q9UkFF2hxNZ++ec15BpaOBZX6Z7Di+F=KsEtBsL0ucvb2w@mail.gmail.com> <55B20499.8010008@lacnic.net> <55B20544.30108@tzi.org> <E549EF4A-32FD-43FE-A605-F9DFC9D4DA8C@verisign.com> <55B257FB.4090709@cesnet.cz> <2D717D4A-4738-4CB0-B62E-A506EDD88EB1@verisign.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 18:06:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CAH56bmCW_qTnr-WeK24zntSw7hkb62DxuBrEVDKrc+BARXMRsA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matt Mathis <mattmathis@google.com>
To: "Wiley, Glen" <gwiley@verisign.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113f2b4ec31a31051ba8ba55"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/7iuk3C9zyWL1BQeDgviAO_07y0w>
Cc: Ondřej Caletka <Ondrej.Caletka@cesnet.cz>, "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime?
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 01:06:27 -0000
What is weird, is we had other friends completely unrelated to the IETF, visiting Prague a week before the IETF, and they reported the same FUD crime reports. It was even oddly the same words, like two different people retelling the same news story. I wonder if something notable happened a few weeks ago. Thanks, --MM-- The best way to predict the future is to create it. - Alan Kay Privacy matters! We know from recent events that people are using our services to speak in defiance of unjust governments. We treat privacy and security as matters of life and death, because for some users, they are. On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Wiley, Glen <gwiley@verisign.com> wrote: > It was in a phone case in a bag so they had to go through 2 layers to get > to it. > > It's not the theft that hurts, it expand to my wife where the money went 😐 > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Jul 24, 2015, at 10:21, Ondřej Caletka <Ondrej.Caletka@cesnet.cz> > wrote: > > > > Dne 24.7.2015 v 12:20 Wiley, Glen napsal(a): > >> I agree, however I made the mistake of leaving $100 usd in a bag in my > room which the hotel relieved me of. > > > > WHAT? Do I understand correctly that you left $100 in locked room and it > > disappeared?! In Hilton?! > > I would certainly not expect something like that. Have you notified the > > hotel staff? > > > > The only plausible explanation would be that it has been misinterpreted > > as a tip for maid. > > > > Cheers, > > Ondřej Caletka > > > > _______________________________________________ > > 93attendees mailing list > > 93attendees@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees > > > > > _______________________________________________ > 93attendees mailing list > 93attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees >
- Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime? Randall Gellens
- [93attendees] so, was there any crime? Aaron Falk
- Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime? Elise Gerich
- Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime? Natasha Rooney
- Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime? Carlos M. Martinez
- Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime? Carsten Bormann
- Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime? Jeff Haas
- Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime? Wiley, Glen
- Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime? Mike Bishop
- Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime? Ondřej Caletka
- Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime? trevor.chandler
- Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime? Rodriguez, Iben
- Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime? trevor.chandler
- Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime? Warren Kumari
- Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime? Livingood, Jason
- Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime? Wiley, Glen
- Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime? Matt Mathis
- [93attendees] Please *do* heed warnings about pic… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [93attendees] Please *do* heed warnings about… Michal Krsek
- Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime? Tim Chown
- Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime? Tim Chown
- Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime? Michal Krsek
- Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime? Jared Mauch
- Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime? David C Lawrence
- Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime? Wiley, Glen
- Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime? Eric Gray
- Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime? Wiley, Glen
- Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime? Bert Wijnen (IETF)
- Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime? Jared Mauch
- Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime? Eric Gray
- Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime? Randall Gellens
- Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime? KAMEI Satoshi / 亀井聡