Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime?

Randall Gellens <randy@qti.qualcomm.com> Fri, 24 July 2015 09:37 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFB171A8783 for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j8QH3B-eEV15 for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com (wolverine01.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.254]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 458DB1A86F7 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qti.qualcomm.com; i=@qti.qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1437730645; x=1469266645; h=message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:to:from:subject: mime-version; bh=C7IBtWlozo6QpzIOa+FV8vczjFe6U4AioDBJeJNPMBs=; b=y/tCTCs8DoeWYMLqr7jak3qka4ka5X9uJjejmVhBTVZuDvehWlrJGUVo d8iIA3YCGFnj8sD//BWfVTdgpzx3Jg29j1H00uCmBu127PmITuIzsxRIQ R1f7JDWBxMSPrtxiW2foYuaz4FLdXU1WC6WyztbrGjzx2FE13C5UMwMPJ M=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5700,7163,7871"; a="129481210"
Received: from ironmsg03-r.qualcomm.com ([172.30.46.17]) by wolverine01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 24 Jul 2015 02:37:24 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,537,1432623600"; d="scan'208";a="968749652"
Received: from nasanexm02f.na.qualcomm.com ([10.85.0.87]) by Ironmsg03-R.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 24 Jul 2015 02:37:25 -0700
Received: from [130.129.14.251] (10.80.80.8) by nasanexm02f.na.qualcomm.com (10.85.0.87) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1076.9; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:37:23 -0700
Message-ID: <p06240603d1d7b542ea01@[130.129.14.251]>
In-Reply-To: <CAD62q9UkFF2hxNZ++ec15BpaOBZX6Z7Di+F=KsEtBsL0ucvb2w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD62q9UkFF2hxNZ++ec15BpaOBZX6Z7Di+F=KsEtBsL0ucvb2w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Eudora for Mac OS X
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:37:19 -0700
To: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>, 93attendees@ietf.org
From: Randall Gellens <randy@qti.qualcomm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Originating-IP: [10.80.80.8]
X-ClientProxiedBy: NASANEXM01F.na.qualcomm.com (10.85.0.32) To nasanexm02f.na.qualcomm.com (10.85.0.87)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/uQGT8QZXRnrj7loso218tGyRCh8>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime?
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:37:27 -0000

At 11:13 AM +0200 7/24/15, Aaron Falk wrote:

>  I saw a great deal of FUD about the dangers of Prague (or cities, 
> in general), pickpockets and such.  In my experience, this has been 
> a great city for an IETF and I'd love to come back.  The hotel was 
> nice, the food and beer were cheap, the city is attractive, the 
> flight was reasonable cost.  As most folks have experienced, there 
> were some bumps (hotel reservations, network stability) but they 
> seemed transient and fixable in a future visit.  Did the threats of 
> pickpockets materialize?

I hope you're not suggesting that pickpockets are nonexistent here. 
At previous IETFs here there were a number of IETF participants who 
reported being victimized.  (Not that this is unique to Prague in any 
way.)  To characterize cautions against pickpockets as FUD seems a 
bit dismissive.  I hope that no participant was victimized, and that 
perhaps the cautions helped.

As European locations go, Prague seems on the whole OK.  As with 
every location, it has both advantages and disadvantages.  The 
difficulty in finding non-smoking restaurants, and the amount of 
smoke present in various locations within the hotel, were problems 
for me, but not sufficient to rule out Prague again.  The fact that 
we were given transit passes was a definite advantage.

You say that the network problems are fixable on a future visit. 
 From the NOC reports, I'd say that depends on if the hotel's provider 
replaces the APs, or guests bring their own APs (which I regret not 
doing).


-- 
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
The thing I miss about Air Force One is they don't lose my luggage.
        --President George Bush Sr.