IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime?

"Wiley, Glen" <gwiley@verisign.com> Sat, 25 July 2015 00:45 UTC

Return-Path: <gwiley@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 467761ACE54 for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 17:45:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q6-l1Z7YznIk for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 17:45:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-f99.google.com (mail-qg0-f99.google.com [209.85.192.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 493F91A8A44 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 17:45:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qgy5 with SMTP id 5so2134257qgy.3 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 17:45:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index :date:message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language :content-language:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; bh=qz5ClC1P3dEQPA/9DUcgBx8BotVaNCtBBKkSta3kf5E=; b=QmOQW6/hEA1z04GHn+Mb45wftxp6pYYsMhLChhLjJ2NxuHOO/TaKgzNJoFXoZr3naT I0AN675LklHy5iiHCv00m3esLoCT3ajcOza1Moo0qb3sekV96oDuM+KYVN20NaKMhpLE flFrG+XBJCZkgcFD07HvBh6y4I4Y2nsiyhomkRRgyuJnMeBAxW03WEbhd6RFGh4/7fBT mkJqViXgnlLsLzxINJEEnEUyrCPPTgvot3p4K2hn5VKyNjZxUcuVd6YbxY+hE/sXVCyU aKDOmbaaD0nLrwdzzOn/imWqG7wK2ugi2aeWX+W+SP5Tb/vbc5dDcs+Fe4Fs+dRsigPL 1g7w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmpiy8Q+sdkyAiPX5WtOZkErYgdoKj/X9iIdEV9mDUJkbBHw5M2HLbNNyM4x3s+g4YsNDhbzpwTrZmG3Mc+zfPwIsrzKQ==
X-Received: by 10.140.22.135 with SMTP id 7mr24360635qgn.98.1437785134425; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 17:45:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com (brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com. [72.13.63.42]) by smtp-relay.gmail.com with ESMTPS id 1sm3321745qkx.1.2015.07.24.17.45.34 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 24 Jul 2015 17:45:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Relaying-Domain: verisign.com
Received: from brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas02 [10.173.152.206]) by brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t6P0jXBx001437 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 Jul 2015 20:45:33 -0400
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 20:45:33 -0400
From: "Wiley, Glen" <gwiley@verisign.com>
To: Ondřej Caletka <Ondrej.Caletka@cesnet.cz>
Thread-Topic: [93attendees] so, was there any crime?
Thread-Index: AQHQxfEFfdtRce/b5kW/hxKIHSa9hJ3qnJuAgAAAzAD//8t6NIAAlyGAgABaiCI=
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 00:45:32 +0000
Message-ID: <2D717D4A-4738-4CB0-B62E-A506EDD88EB1@verisign.com>
References: <CAD62q9UkFF2hxNZ++ec15BpaOBZX6Z7Di+F=KsEtBsL0ucvb2w@mail.gmail.com> <55B20499.8010008@lacnic.net>, <55B20544.30108@tzi.org> <E549EF4A-32FD-43FE-A605-F9DFC9D4DA8C@verisign.com>, <55B257FB.4090709@cesnet.cz>
In-Reply-To: <55B257FB.4090709@cesnet.cz>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/mUIjaH4S2ExqFysLYP9PVhXDzS8>
Cc: "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime?
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 00:45:37 -0000

It was in a phone case in a bag so they had to go through 2 layers to get to it.

It's not the theft that hurts, it expand to my wife where the money went 😐

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 24, 2015, at 10:21, Ondřej Caletka <Ondrej.Caletka@cesnet.cz> wrote:
> 
> Dne 24.7.2015 v 12:20 Wiley, Glen napsal(a):
>> I agree, however I made the mistake of leaving $100 usd in a bag in my room which the hotel relieved me of.
> 
> WHAT? Do I understand correctly that you left $100 in locked room and it
> disappeared?! In Hilton?!
> I would certainly not expect something like that. Have you notified the
> hotel staff?
> 
> The only plausible explanation would be that it has been misinterpreted
> as a tip for maid.
> 
> Cheers,
> Ondřej Caletka
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 93attendees mailing list
> 93attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email