Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime?

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Mon, 27 July 2015 11:19 UTC

Return-Path: <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A9FD1A914B for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 04:19:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.469
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.469 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZHAS_3BAh4Cm for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 04:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 653D51A907F for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 04:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t6RBJ1Lx008153; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 12:19:01 +0100
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk t6RBJ1Lx008153
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=ecs.soton.ac.uk; s=201304; t=1437995944; bh=WcFqSrH7eb/0kDM9toQbwVlLjw0=; h=Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=c/A0V7aGO/3IFxqzvM5ek2W/u+2bN0iG0fwlwfr12GJH55LHeumjeBPGjefVn9wVP Qy5hs/dX23273U3vagUYQosBSLe7/HPYoLUsNUVMWdUxsPKpIk8aWtQTiLGaDRGuoC CNbg4U/YO1ucYMAPvSlGVzoM55zXV/s/dLRGXVyY=
Received: from gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102::25d]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) envelope-from <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> with ESMTP (valid=N/A) id r6QCJ12880603728My ret-id none; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 12:19:04 +0100
Received: from dhcp-204-168.wireless.soton.ac.uk (dhcp-204-168.wireless.soton.ac.uk [152.78.204.168]) (authenticated bits=0) by gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t6RBIvNQ010813 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 27 Jul 2015 12:18:58 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\))
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <298F3091D15FCB4DB0604E444DB34467BBC93BD0@sy-facmbx02.ad.hccs.edu>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 12:18:57 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <EMEW3|4c4bd3021cd8f6210c837b577d3015dar6QCJ103tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|5D8C80E9-1720-4C2E-B63A-593CD31C1DE7@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <CAD62q9UkFF2hxNZ++ec15BpaOBZX6Z7Di+F=KsEtBsL0ucvb2w@mail.gmail.com> <BL2PR03MB13293057E4825998A0A9E1087810@BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <298F3091D15FCB4DB0604E444DB34467BBC93BD0@sy-facmbx02.ad.hccs.edu> <5D8C80E9-1720-4C2E-B63A-593CD31C1DE7@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: "trevor.chandler" <trevor.chandler@hccs.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102)
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-smtpf-Report: sid=r6QCJ1288060372800; tid=r6QCJ12880603728My; client=relay,ipv6; mail=; rcpt=; nrcpt=4:0; fails=0
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-ID: t6RBJ1Lx008153
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/Yx2ONLfnee_XrPwkrMvPxLrOoSk>
Cc: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>, "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime?
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:19:15 -0000

On 24 Jul 2015, at 17:54, trevor.chandler <trevor.chandler@hccs.edu> wrote:
> 
> Be glad they didn't charge you for
> the water.  I've had a restaurant to
> charge me $1.50 for a cup of hot
> water.

Beer is cheaper in Prague!

The value for money in Prague was exceptional in every place I went. The only expensive place was the Hilton, but I never ate there.

Tim