IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime?

Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qti.qualcomm.com> Mon, 27 July 2015 20:57 UTC

Return-Path: <rg+ietf@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957F31B33D6 for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:57:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Quarantine-ID: <hXif7EsIgBb7>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "MIME-Version"
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hXif7EsIgBb7 for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:57:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sabertooth01.qualcomm.com (sabertooth01.qualcomm.com [65.197.215.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95A621B33D1 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:57:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qti.qualcomm.com; i=@qti.qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1438030627; x=1469566627; h=message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:to:from:subject; bh=q6B5PoZ0zZH/q4K7ps9b/L+z1UfqI024f5oaQFJ4CKI=; b=QMSBBRmShPoD3YVdpAbbY/9qqt5Kv6Er2rAOXCJC7kwT2wDcJES02TwF YikSmoLpfeWBb0pxNEJS3L14iNmzRlMgKzUv8HxooDKuYqYbUmJC/ceZi 4Izuuv/4UnZWgyymK9+5dxcUmpLIKQBS5gej+KnWWTeuDgny+mhfNPmAA o=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5700,7163,7875"; a="93554793"
Received: from ironmsg02-r.qualcomm.com ([172.30.46.16]) by sabertooth01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 27 Jul 2015 13:57:07 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,556,1432623600"; d="scan'208";a="521462379"
Received: from plus.qualcomm.com ([10.52.255.8]) by ironmsg02-R.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 27 Jul 2015 13:57:06 -0700
Received: from ironmsg02-L.qualcomm.com (ironmsg02-L.qualcomm.com [172.30.48.16]) by plus.qualcomm.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/1.0) with ESMTP id t6RKv498021075; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:57:06 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,557,1432623600"; d="scan'208";a="490597422"
X-ojodefuego: yes
Received: from myvpn-l-00190.ras.qualcomm.com (HELO [99.111.97.136]) ([10.64.133.221]) by ironmsg02-L.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 27 Jul 2015 13:56:52 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240607d1dc4b2028a7@[99.111.97.136]>
In-Reply-To: <21942.16255.474612.347992@tale.kendall.corp.akamai.com>
References: <CAD62q9UkFF2hxNZ++ec15BpaOBZX6Z7Di+F=KsEtBsL0ucvb2w@mail.gmail.com> <21942.16255.474612.347992@tale.kendall.corp.akamai.com>
X-Mailer: Eudora for Mac OS X
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:56:44 -0700
To: David C Lawrence <tale@akamai.com>, 93attendees@ietf.org
From: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qti.qualcomm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/afFqzt5c7_ZoJV0pX-YW-1wJ8W4>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime?
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 20:57:09 -0000

At 10:26 AM -0400 7/27/15, David C Lawrence wrote:

>  When I asked my hotel for a taxi to the hospital they
>  arranged one, and said it would be 250 CZK (~ 10 USD) for the ~ 1 km
>  trip.  Further, the taxi didn't take credit cards so the desk clerk
>  spot-changed $20 USD for me to 460 CZK, which isn't highway robbery
>  but was certainly on the lower end of exchange.

If this was the Hilton and the in-house taxi, those take credit cards 
or you could have charged it to your room.  If it was not the Hilton, 
or the hotel called an outside taxi, then the rate would be lwoer but 
no guarantee of taking credit cards.

-- 
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
All programmers are playwrights and all computers are lousy actors.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email