[96attendees] T-Shirts

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 19 July 2016 16:06 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 96attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 96attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 107B212D768 for <96attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 09:06:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IDbin7-fZrIk for <96attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 09:06:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x234.google.com (mail-vk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2B1012DA02 for <96attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 08:58:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id g1so18214773vkb.3 for <96attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 08:58:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=g00fks28n9BR9QBDf/3YKSbRBNBAtEJ33HRx6lvQeEk=; b=G+emULp85V/Mnz10Vn1H1eQ9R5zUGKD9IiwPqedniDf7uQx3Bn3tNqXjVi0FC13VGs IrB5ANo5MNzhNZAN135OV6jSfNhp4yL89s1uJOUdb2EeGNJcd74ouujEbQcE0aOUpzbe dq3ew17eYu2X8bXM3/ipAaK4xpKiwmzj+UZ29jbKufVx8wKh6z58qcDqsRnh/9fPUJPn HKP2A1vKUD2Vejyql8OzDtxvMn340Q8Rk353Zh3JH3yyth9rcqV492ydFC8XXlpubF3k DoSdy1kHQNkg2BeQEtniwFyab9VPAMuU9vF/j+MRjHJxau+/D7Tfa+7JNU9xmJ1hVK8V /JEw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=g00fks28n9BR9QBDf/3YKSbRBNBAtEJ33HRx6lvQeEk=; b=NpJ1aPfEOoOp0VfxXnXTYeiRwmC9UmdKslE3dzE1FkigGGhBVE5YloDz4EOGEdgO/r YC9k95+aetnlE0374wcVbPaiQnHyBZ5JDbnTRdSUn3FLxQOjrwAvKFT/basNzOHRkQqb jGzFuVsnmTSUM7lxJCzYGfPsbq0UQ3ZU9BDEs7/96OwdMz7YYBHgOTkpgLUfTjMGVKyJ Ft5ANS9mAVL+xn8bCJSe8AnoeIXayzD3ADO84yXPHEgeLY0pyCbhREVSf0WJnHtIIAgL /okh88XYmZ3rArtIS7dzR5Sgm9PRiacUgQRgML7vICuoECeWuntZ6a/KfWbBNhFh8STx hJoA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJjOboZc0wEiYVe5krDVXIaxr4QviwKZA8y+Z58FV+e2St66huTb8VIoQ+jKS/hkX9ahDbb6jsXAHhTPQ==
X-Received: by 10.176.68.102 with SMTP id m93mr20739218uam.111.1468943883748; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 08:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.159.37.104 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 08:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 11:58:03 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH6-LRe6DnG=6Q1xZ5w=Kywik+RDd+zXTEqL6JFEsT=dbw@mail.gmail.com>
To: 96attendees@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/96attendees/jLMp-33SiTg5flMMnsg5zvGyR5k>
Subject: [96attendees] T-Shirts
X-BeenThere: 96attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <96attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/96attendees>, <mailto:96attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/96attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:96attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:96attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/96attendees>, <mailto:96attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 16:06:08 -0000

Hello,

This is the second IETF I was not able to get a T-shirt.  This time I
tried on Monday, last time it was a Tuesday.  The problem seems to be
that men are taking the women sizes.  For this meeting, I was told
that many men thought the men's sizes were too big, so they took a
size they didn't order.

Can we either plan to order the size we will request or just order
more smaller sizes than what people request, preferably the former.

I think we are consistently left with the bigger sizes, but could be wrong.

-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen