Re: [97attendees] Thanks for Seoul (Re: Food poisoning)

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Mon, 21 November 2016 23:51 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: 97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D96129502 for <97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 15:51:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.696
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.696 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sjW5AQTrCYO0 for <97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 15:51:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBB4F1294B0 for <97attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 15:51:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from faui40p.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40p.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:77]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69DF858C4B8; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 00:51:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: by faui40p.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 56AE8B0AEDC; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 00:51:28 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 00:51:28 +0100
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Message-ID: <20161121235127.GU9776@faui40p.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <CAD62q9W-VncWdvM4r=p8kGHanmMvTKpsFFtNmv_sbowOr3R2Kw@mail.gmail.com> <99d217bb-cc70-a460-9c5a-6bf6658602db@sidn.nl> <af2f55f8-9f20-0e16-9986-d19d4621fb2a@labn.net> <BA77BE7B914AB9EAF64144F9@JcK-HP8200>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <BA77BE7B914AB9EAF64144F9@JcK-HP8200>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/97attendees/93qGxX8h_nFRXva6PWcfir2sym8>
Cc: 97attendees@ietf.org, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Subject: Re: [97attendees] Thanks for Seoul (Re: Food poisoning)
X-BeenThere: 97attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 97 attendees that have opted in on this list." <97attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/97attendees>, <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/97attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:97attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees>, <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 23:51:32 -0000

Indeed: +1. First time i attended remotely. Meetecho worked
really well even though i forgot to register as remote WG chair upfront.
And my wallet was happy as well. And i was lucky with the TZ
(PST listening into asia time is a great late shift for most sessions).
I totally missed the food poisoning though (not)!

One suggestion: I couldn't find a cross-conference meetecho wiki page.
Instead it seems there is a separate one for every meeting.

Might make sense to have one where participants and meetecho folks can
collect insight into common issues/fixes. Eg: Brian Carpenter had
browser issues hat he fixed somehow (forgot how), i had issues on a
bad-bw public access point where browser A totally didn't work, but
browser B did work very well, etc. pp..

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 04:35:58PM -0500, John C Klensin wrote:
> 
> Let me add thanks for the excellent remote participation
> support, notably with Meetecho.  As with everything else, there
> are still areas that could be improved (the multiple
> non-overlapping agendas and failure to get meeting materials for
> particular sessions posted early enough are at the top of my
> list at the moment) but this meeting was clearly "Best yet" by a
> significant margin.    So thanks to the local facilities, the
> Meetecho team, the NOC and network team, the Secretariat, and
> Ray in no particular order ... job really well done.
> 
>     john
> 
> 
> 
> --On Monday, November 21, 2016 10:58 -0500 Lou Berger
> <lberger@labn.net> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On November 21, 2016 7:07:04 AM "Marco Davids (SIDN)"
> > <marco.davids@sidn.nl> wrote:
> >> ... I had an excellent time in
> >> Seoul. Loved the atmosphere, loved the food, loved the people.
> >> 
> > 
> > 
> > Speaking only for myself:
> > 
> > Overall I agree.
> > 
> > Thanks to the hosts and all those who worked hard to make
> > Seoul a very productive meeting!
> > 
> > Lou
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > 97attendees mailing list
> > 97attendees@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 97attendees mailing list
> 97attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees

-- 
---
tte@cs.fau.de