IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Add] [Ext] My single use case

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Fri, 11 September 2020 14:51 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F383A0ABA for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 07:51:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0YH9AnsA9fQi for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 07:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppa2.lax.icann.org (ppa2.lax.icann.org [192.0.33.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DE6C3A0A74 for <add@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 07:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MBX112-E2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (out.mail.icann.org [64.78.33.7]) by ppa2.lax.icann.org (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with ESMTPS id 08BEpBvs017385 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:51:11 GMT
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.659.4; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 07:51:10 -0700
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) with mapi id 15.02.0659.006; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 07:51:10 -0700
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: tirumal reddy <kondtir@gmail.com>
CC: ADD Mailing list <add@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ext] [Add] My single use case
Thread-Index: AQHWiEr8/3trNRWlLEWMqSNwO9xnig==
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:51:10 +0000
Message-ID: <3C102757-D2CF-41A3-965B-85471722A1EB@icann.org>
References: <d4bd287a-d2ce-40cd-b635-4f74efbc77f6@www.fastmail.com> <CAFpG3ge=fyBOKsjZr+uK+kdmUsp0U1+osJjHSiwB9V59ctq=RA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPOjAor0js5RYkpzm0-6-Awx8Px06ycwu_W5XWakxYt2w@mail.gmail.com> <CAFpG3gfUr86haKDrMGTt7YjEG4uufdwF=16SbGb+5xs8JrLteg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFpG3gfUr86haKDrMGTt7YjEG4uufdwF=16SbGb+5xs8JrLteg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
x-source-routing-agent: Processed
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C3C674F5-09A3-46F1-B76A-233D19BEDBE6"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-09-11_05:2020-09-10, 2020-09-11 signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/6XokhTovHGhwkjqb4FQnxey_T_Y>
Subject: Re: [Add] [Ext] My single use case
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:51:15 -0000

On Sep 11, 2020, at 5:06 AM, tirumal reddy <kondtir@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 at 16:45, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
> 
>> For wired network you plug into the wall.
>> For a wireless network, someone gives you an SSID and a (common) password.
>> 
> You seem to be referring to home/coffee shop use cases and not relevant to on-boarding devices in an enterprise network.

It is wrong to say that Ekr's model "is not relevant" to enterprise networks. Some enterprise networks use extra configuration for handing out resolver information, many enterprise networks (including the one I'm using at the moment) do not.

It's fine to say that Martin's use case is not the use case you personally are interested in; please don't dismiss it as "not relevant".

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email