Re: [Add] My single use case

tirumal reddy <kondtir@gmail.com> Fri, 11 September 2020 05:59 UTC

Return-Path: <kondtir@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DBF43A1475 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 22:59:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a38LIjeWRG_G for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 22:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2e.google.com (mail-io1-xd2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64A6A3A1474 for <add@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 22:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2e.google.com with SMTP id r9so9849909ioa.2 for <add@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 22:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ji2HnNQ669bSKYHVL5aVFqrbiIsi2KkJ/9g58F1OD2M=; b=NJv0UvpU23OtQnmiRBD4OwFedVxG+3Qvu0IWu0936Vb+Iq2h5pCReezBnP+HqwR3vc fdF6RDt/x9y3htAWnq3pA1TVUDclYuXxJP3gQQm5qjnfcemMqcgRCTwHujml4A77j+30 nCw0D4Pgog10Cbrup0fgIhsU657qLqFTdHuWFMinjlcbf59xoeeyPgSxZyex7Pmg1x3l 7KCbK60r4oK1GcKiA4F4CWw1nqyv7foOADwlTlRQhjKTTfZr3zSxrgxGRxuBJaR7I9Jd BLRqzS38u3iCi46Meg4NdvRFOB5zFZgLhIRg+O8e3QSAcgla7ZRA5Nw0lDhpiLikpo4b iOsQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ji2HnNQ669bSKYHVL5aVFqrbiIsi2KkJ/9g58F1OD2M=; b=RlWUd/9gLV4VEYLlRaa1IMyxIl4OEraDMV03od1nRq2qCaO8B1ljg9C0AVQopHC9/C fQe1+1kOYAW1xptGk8VaozGgpDUnT77Uc0wOX6HOfeZ1BuvzQV6h75pP1NVO1xXwyoMc 5FOeXhs7X69N4b53/crMOyrC5luIWGQHS+4x3w8Z5uREwW/QB0SQslTXHChEUNiJuHeA VvVBtNZQB6gYhQinMVGc3mvaDfVA0iYbJ5lsqPdxDmF6M63MZ50e4Zw6K+XBsuPpnd88 Sw3dbgyL5ssFVmfMVqqmI1VA93ZCxZzAFW09Zb/Hk1zgjWGuU0ugNKpmpUIgGa1zdxzl 6h9A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531GOwURG9vnYa7ePG1sXkj1DBTYmeOA3HqMf+oQ1YCAaRcar+EJ hNHv+jMOGDlxKb6cz71ZQiRIiJRnjHYoXyicWbFabXBOJqN+Uw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwWemP4hKoKujzcelnxYWx5beawiYV++9yDSMvlErb4Y88UF5L1GT8bEjZrRwkypMLWbImShP+qtjv0Np4SOsg=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:6607:: with SMTP id k7mr476037jac.91.1599803954504; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 22:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <d4bd287a-d2ce-40cd-b635-4f74efbc77f6@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <d4bd287a-d2ce-40cd-b635-4f74efbc77f6@www.fastmail.com>
From: tirumal reddy <kondtir@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:29:03 +0530
Message-ID: <CAFpG3ge=fyBOKsjZr+uK+kdmUsp0U1+osJjHSiwB9V59ctq=RA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
Cc: ADD Mailing list <add@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006b279505af036287"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/8bTleHxJ8a83Zc-Y45ekZ_iyAr4>
Subject: Re: [Add] My single use case
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 05:59:17 -0000

The use case looks incomplete, it does not explain how the new device is
on-boarded into the network.

-Tiru

On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 20:38, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote:

> My preference is to tackle just this:
>
> As a new device or application, when I join a network that I have no prior
> relationship with or configuration for, I want to discover the DoT or DoH
> resolver that corresponds to the Do53 resolver offered by that network.
>
> This might need the full matrix of DoT/DoH, v4/v6, with/without a
> forwarder, but this is fundamentally just a single use case.
>
> Specifically, I want to NOT learn about whether the resolver does qname
> minimization or DoT to the authoritative or whether it does the eDNS client
> subnet or different policies with respect to what is answered or anything
> else that might make a decision to use this alternative complicated.
> Existing methods don't provide this information.  I don't want a protocol
> that does anything fancy because that makes the decision complex.
>
> --
> Add mailing list
> Add@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add
>