Re: [Add] My single use case

tirumal reddy <kondtir@gmail.com> Fri, 11 September 2020 12:06 UTC

Return-Path: <kondtir@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 150E63A083B for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 05:06:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lISl9PVmn3D0 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 05:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd29.google.com (mail-io1-xd29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 789A43A0E8C for <add@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 05:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd29.google.com with SMTP id r9so10754302ioa.2 for <add@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 05:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=azTWoOMWDOAKuPI09xnIdhNvbT/Z2FmAVkBWGZHxDjs=; b=k9sbzEfFZk2KT5Ix/zfhL89sKQsACzv6q205OP3BVo40TuJDUeXETZAEhk+fttrzSR cPgImlK0Mr2xf1Ck8405EK9KTc7tC5ebTMUzD7Mnh5HqMhW28wZotT9CwS/5S5uxMFp7 rz/XVxtTpHdOjzgS0haM2SgiCQkLHtxKbPWXigmWhvQSJeF2Klpm/wK4hzGl8iMumKM9 WH2eFEmUG9rNYLgPUBV91Wb9mItHXLSR+PpkJJ0FCF6CsisoUnru+vCUnvWohfpMLzUH z9W059cswtiuZeGASKJDPRxL8apQYBxABcepEJe6+VBNTeNJJaAK2ug2ZRKun7CezNBs mDQg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=azTWoOMWDOAKuPI09xnIdhNvbT/Z2FmAVkBWGZHxDjs=; b=CVias3fkCE7OthcFEWJTOagiygwnYnaAo48gReENYaBSccmRMwdMOpFaWgUv27F4NM Z+qnmPC7iaSXu86DBJAZL6cBiERcg7Cbh/IJ9uv1Z5nsgUR4c4J1fCsAC0FAFq1APDwp QJyVal9bGzMzzOzDiGs0W9v2pIUQk4pyoa3L6X9Xq2/oXZ7FGEUEtaO9jG5ew+b2YmO9 30sQnUiTCD95698CfdjKjaagmMC2+01ZOCccsl8KvQRUhVSoOtwjt9EZ3jTQoHv6nbvK mkj0eylbB2/giCPfm+51oLVO4GgFGCdnKxcj+kI96K/4PjZVm23iimfPcZl0jgvW8DAA Q4wQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532P0M5oxNH3adIWm1ES5agLbw4NpkEcakfcH6OkR997IP/FK/+W GWIplis1Phb3qA3nGyuoyXNo6kbIUDK+3RTQOmEJvk4vDviMIg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxKrmWFIDD5v3gUWYaHtnKaHU0Ce7C8BlEcfU9kdNh0WelNn5YuHmuQljzHv/zf1bNKCzBUYbOKUlAvlt22sMY=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:c8d6:: with SMTP id y205mr1440122iof.177.1599825984730; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 05:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <d4bd287a-d2ce-40cd-b635-4f74efbc77f6@www.fastmail.com> <CAFpG3ge=fyBOKsjZr+uK+kdmUsp0U1+osJjHSiwB9V59ctq=RA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPOjAor0js5RYkpzm0-6-Awx8Px06ycwu_W5XWakxYt2w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBPOjAor0js5RYkpzm0-6-Awx8Px06ycwu_W5XWakxYt2w@mail.gmail.com>
From: tirumal reddy <kondtir@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 17:36:13 +0530
Message-ID: <CAFpG3gfUr86haKDrMGTt7YjEG4uufdwF=16SbGb+5xs8JrLteg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>, ADD Mailing list <add@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000085bcdd05af088331"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/YhY1KlgZHwcK0Fr2xTXw9ad6Wx8>
Subject: Re: [Add] My single use case
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:06:27 -0000

On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 at 16:45, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 10:59 PM tirumal reddy <kondtir@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The use case looks incomplete, it does not explain how the new device is
>> on-boarded into the network.
>>
>
> For wired network you plug into the wall.
> For a wireless network, someone gives you an SSID and a (common) password.
>

You seem to be referring to home/coffee shop use cases and not relevant to
on-boarding devices in an enterprise network.

-Tiru


> For mobile, via the usual mechanisms.
>
> -Ekr
>
> -Tiru
>>
>> On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 20:38, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote:
>>
>>> My preference is to tackle just this:
>>>
>>> As a new device or application, when I join a network that I have no
>>> prior relationship with or configuration for, I want to discover the DoT or
>>> DoH resolver that corresponds to the Do53 resolver offered by that network.
>>>
>>> This might need the full matrix of DoT/DoH, v4/v6, with/without a
>>> forwarder, but this is fundamentally just a single use case.
>>>
>>> Specifically, I want to NOT learn about whether the resolver does qname
>>> minimization or DoT to the authoritative or whether it does the eDNS client
>>> subnet or different policies with respect to what is answered or anything
>>> else that might make a decision to use this alternative complicated.
>>> Existing methods don't provide this information.  I don't want a protocol
>>> that does anything fancy because that makes the decision complex.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Add mailing list
>>> Add@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add
>>>
>> --
>> Add mailing list
>> Add@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add
>>
>