Re: [Add] [Ext] My single use case

[tirumal reddy <[e-mail]>]

On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 at 20:21, Paul Hoffman <[e-mail]> wrote:

> On Sep 11, 2020, at 5:06 AM, tirumal reddy <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 at 16:45, Eric Rescorla <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >
> >> For wired network you plug into the wall.
> >> For a wireless network, someone gives you an SSID and a (common)
> password.
> >>
> > You seem to be referring to home/coffee shop use cases and not relevant
> to on-boarding devices in an enterprise network.
>
> It is wrong to say that Ekr's model "is not relevant" to enterprise
> networks.


I only meant common password is "not relevent" to an Enterprise network.


> Some enterprise networks use extra configuration for handing out resolver
> information,

many enterprise networks (including the one I'm using at the moment) do not.
>

Yes, it depends on the enterprise network. In addtion, whether it is a
IT-owned devices, BYOD with MDM or configuration profile or a BYOD with
unique credentails. The use case should consider all the above type devices
including IoT devices.


>
> It's fine to say that Martin's use case is not the use case you personally
> are interested in; please don't dismiss it as "not relevant".
>

I am interested in the use case :)  I would like to understand whether the
use case is for a Home or Enterprise network.

Cheers,
-Tiru


>
> --Paul Hoffman
>
>