IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [antitrust-policy] New Version Notification for draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-06.txt

Jorge Contreras <cntreras@gmail.com> Wed, 26 July 2023 22:31 UTC

Return-Path: <cntreras@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C07EC151063; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:31:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29hZSNbND1Pe; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:31:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2c.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D75CC14F738; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:31:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2c.google.com with SMTP id ada2fe7eead31-444c42f608aso151996137.1; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:31:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1690410701; x=1691015501; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Hd8BGTTfznjy79ZxY5gvZykClKR0vm35mqnptQjiuL0=; b=nb5tDItc3xElTAlCa1IiA4ck2hMLDM/ze34zD4b5k/UigDmJ52rwIkPEjAsNrFqcM+ eaXUPCy6+HdnaBhZcOpERRLHH4hp11Q4ireDo/QbQypympzr+X2wBGCOUyd8V03shqxH MUflfJbuUGsuTRz+Q02Oj32+Pb4TXO8jpPtDyNsD6hpY7CvkkifKkApR5fwNXFwnypDT ExV84wWZn1IK9ph5UYoU4FmFMQCrAHg1bvAHU0qYkNGhX28bmR9feV+6oWKVm7rtc67W s8I7nFG5v3QH6Uf+s8hBbeKJUVCiW3WPajULt840AuOHBfrMA/AqJzmp0TPTCvgx/cIf 3rcQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1690410701; x=1691015501; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Hd8BGTTfznjy79ZxY5gvZykClKR0vm35mqnptQjiuL0=; b=lh5bkL4V2wQPSu2593FqQTkOf/n7BTEh7+VusGsGzkUH52kb/0hEiMNnMmjrE5SJCM YMwyDQRrXBIdPjD2E6JZRSzQpfIw6Vg+AWo9dnqT6svKEiBvytM33LqQceRgE/PLib/c Q9jIGYYYmiR73VZeG5pKphhq3tHx0mu5aAK+7hVKB6dWGzIGSMsuc855iIpd7BgEh8Mx O/IhvCiRx5VM/4fSUw71E9k37DoKAB6Ur3ZpVPa5Q4fH87rD96kZubfUdINIzcDEhK5a 8iqtZpDAxi3ugnv1eiNqE9jSGiUMr/KzKE17ujL9XBQbsB3ZhsxodLRIesjEg8cn+pO9 qkOA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLY3bTANDzOSo7VQXreY7mk4m7ROFOYNeIPT3oiJsvA8F8xeSOEO 2IVQ/NrhVRnxk8oWivZJa3tErvT5PN+nhAERgpQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlE2pQ18N9+eyRfeg3GlUzRVfVWimZOCWo+ZkqNDhEigiZSSeWOa2uURuYYtvwSZoZWVPFCu0ZKlLNOwgDyQPvA=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:f581:0:b0:443:4e7d:c8db with SMTP id i1-20020a67f581000000b004434e7dc8dbmr476955vso.2.1690410701042; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:31:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <168901026560.7883.14919362245027450565@ietfa.amsl.com> <2AE74757-7A99-49EC-8CCF-615CCAB21B6C@ietf.org> <773FB56E-910A-4A74-975B-4D6D97837C23@cooperw.in> <49AF030C-5A32-4C82-91AA-E65F6FA853CA@ietf.org> <8DBD9C3E-2135-4D67-A01E-B2843726391F@cooperw.in> <2f06c146-42f8-f534-d181-121f7007cd35@joelhalpern.com> <CAP0PwYYvS-XyVDezq6hpLXau6rFoFK=AOKhA=-2XLJFsF2gqow@mail.gmail.com> <PH0PR17MB4908C0FE7A97BD33C0D8FA7BAE00A@PH0PR17MB4908.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR17MB4908C0FE7A97BD33C0D8FA7BAE00A@PH0PR17MB4908.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>
From: Jorge Contreras <cntreras@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 16:31:04 -0600
Message-ID: <CAP0PwYYAzD8N_9MDGQ0-xTpNtZqpjJY0=dkLwUASQ8Zzze8caw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org>
Cc: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>, "antitrust-policy@ietf.org" <antitrust-policy@ietf.org>, Brad Biddle <brad@biddle.law>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005c3a2506016b69e3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/antitrust-policy/iGNSs2Z9ZNvoyzA8KaIdJrSpOwA>
Subject: Re: [antitrust-policy] New Version Notification for draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-06.txt
X-BeenThere: antitrust-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss the need for an antitrust or competition policy for the IETF." <antitrust-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/antitrust-policy>, <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/antitrust-policy/>
List-Post: <mailto:antitrust-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/antitrust-policy>, <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 22:31:48 -0000

@Stephan - My apologies - I missed your suggestion, but I think it helps.

On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 4:04 PM Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org> wrote:

> Hi Jorge,
>
> Thanks for your guidance/non-advice.
>
> One question inline.
>
> Stephan
>
>
>
> *From: *antitrust-policy <antitrust-policy-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of
> Jorge Contreras <cntreras@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 14:59
> *To: *Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
> *Cc: *Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>,
> antitrust-policy@ietf.org <antitrust-policy@ietf.org>, Brad Biddle
> <brad@biddle.law>
> *Subject: *Re: [antitrust-policy] New Version Notification for
> draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-06.txt
>
> Speaking as a member of the community and not a legal advisor to anyone on
> this thread,
>
> […]
>
> FWIW, I'm also skeptical about the first bullet of 4.2.  Presumably the
> problem being addressed is using "detailed" market data, but there is no
> definition of "detailed".  It's clear, from 4.1, that companies sharing
> their internal market projections, cost and profit figures is illegal and
> should be prohibited.  But I suspect that's enough, and that the first
> bullet of 4.2 simply adds FUD that will be hard to interpret in practice.
>
>
>
> What do you think about my suggestion to use “unpublished” market data?
>
>
>
> […]
>
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email