Re: [antitrust-policy] New Version Notification for draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-06.txt

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Fri, 25 August 2023 13:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F547C1519B6 for <antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 06:45:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20221208.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9yPPM5nFwfnc for <antitrust-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 06:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw1-x1136.google.com (mail-yw1-x1136.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1136]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4312FC14CE24 for <antitrust-policy@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 06:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw1-x1136.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-58d9ba95c78so11504597b3.1 for <antitrust-policy@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 06:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1692971119; x=1693575919; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ZIfYYdpLMR7P2xIkOWUMrj0e95hXZSLgwqaIZ2W7mWA=; b=EyDf+TpULGRnhjoUG8/cJdGL+Wvm4q6jhLm9TaqeQMJNNjNviCQFqteXjTjDnYoqee tQPI++WEaXC9eLfZ5q4tQMIvR02E29E1P65p1pjjJdheBUDQf73iMoNeVOGjzDx9f4CV sKyNYa6lYgbiE12UNWWlp6KarpmgEoIU7h23EbwQ3fk2gdPWNyC4I2alEB5PW0uE+l4W 5apn+/0b0fl928zKVTzXRGibLjZiMbgHWzlxHoqZPQAIFkeorNCA9TTHCfU6kojHiYRw 1niq8o1x/akyCHYCrrO/hRXxvk7JhXFN1qY3gFgMyzE9F1ijFaWOtZWtzBvvwRVlZ+mc n2Gw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1692971119; x=1693575919; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=ZIfYYdpLMR7P2xIkOWUMrj0e95hXZSLgwqaIZ2W7mWA=; b=S1wp+38w9Y2ATftJahEg4lxFUHjs89HLfv6SXamDVOHu+/pxzgGEaP+nt5tohUv0Ij 99tard08NSCbIMkhhsvxcvC926Sj8iG+TwzrRw7l21KZtsBCLQtTMkER+kPalja9I24e Zv3Kg/NvuVJ6kSXWz5/jYn5y/cVFg1TIdDXEeSkk7bbzzxxd1bzU6w6PMOD/JYTkwOiT wnjIRxMOFxPN2SsULRN6Zj9pvPKyHLolC7KYqMJgwxNNKa3NZGUjq8yXGFlCtAPH87AX ZxL/CZZLLIOtJeveV/tLxrhI7cG77gd/FgxTLe51cDfQtADG5OPBJ7ptY9uzzqgklcYz n1ng==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yycw/ltCM8bDCEK1NlV5rLQR3mCgnItMCumwn+zamJ2kvvHzpXn wv9Oyd2B7662C67a20SJM3u5SZGZff2YgzlAo/L4RA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEQkHGwQ6oulZi4mE9O82EJKUfWku8ht3fyzHNKaOS8RIGFIKZGpmAaSAFc+0P1kXCnk188lQHSXf7fgX56Cf8=
X-Received: by 2002:a0d:ea91:0:b0:57a:6a2c:f4dd with SMTP id t139-20020a0dea91000000b0057a6a2cf4ddmr19137205ywe.36.1692971118870; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 06:45:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <168901026560.7883.14919362245027450565@ietfa.amsl.com> <2AE74757-7A99-49EC-8CCF-615CCAB21B6C@ietf.org> <773FB56E-910A-4A74-975B-4D6D97837C23@cooperw.in> <49AF030C-5A32-4C82-91AA-E65F6FA853CA@ietf.org> <8DBD9C3E-2135-4D67-A01E-B2843726391F@cooperw.in> <2f06c146-42f8-f534-d181-121f7007cd35@joelhalpern.com> <CAP0PwYYvS-XyVDezq6hpLXau6rFoFK=AOKhA=-2XLJFsF2gqow@mail.gmail.com> <PH0PR17MB4908C0FE7A97BD33C0D8FA7BAE00A@PH0PR17MB4908.namprd17.prod.outlook.com> <CAP0PwYYAzD8N_9MDGQ0-xTpNtZqpjJY0=dkLwUASQ8Zzze8caw@mail.gmail.com> <628B9176-2E66-4D32-9049-F02513A5857E@ietf.org> <bec953cb-0f54-d92a-1cc7-45bc8e4b467f@cs.tcd.ie> <926B38E2-DB7B-48A1-ABCE-098FC46D1E25@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <926B38E2-DB7B-48A1-ABCE-098FC46D1E25@ietf.org>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 06:44:43 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBOmM2umvQ12qwOMBipnt9B7c9OQPbkLvjFPFWXK_=1TnA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>
Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "antitrust-policy@ietf.org" <antitrust-policy@ietf.org>, Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Jorge Contreras <cntreras@gmail.com>, Brad Biddle <brad@biddle.law>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000027db930603bf8e84"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/antitrust-policy/sdhiVdPUBpwfRUjo_0sJAO3cb8I>
Subject: Re: [antitrust-policy] New Version Notification for draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-06.txt
X-BeenThere: antitrust-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss the need for an antitrust or competition policy for the IETF." <antitrust-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/antitrust-policy>, <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/antitrust-policy/>
List-Post: <mailto:antitrust-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/antitrust-policy>, <mailto:antitrust-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 13:45:21 -0000

On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 5:22 AM Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org> wrote:

>
>
> On 25 Aug 2023, at 12:41, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
> wrote:
>
>
> Hiya,
>
> On 25/08/2023 11:31, Jay Daley wrote:
>
>  * Using/unpublished/  market data to evaluate the relative
> implementation costs of/alternative technical proposals/  to decide
> whether one is significantly more feasible in the market and thus
> a better candidate for standardization.
>
>
> FWIW, I don't think that's an improvement. We often
> get reports that someone reports x% failures with a
> new mechanism without them publishing the underlying
> data, and we often do, and should, act on those if
> they're credible (which they mostly are in my
> experience).
>
> Maybe the problem is the phrase "market data"? Is
> that meant to include/exclude e.g. reports that
> trials have found that a new TLS extension causes
> some deployed implementations to misbehave?
>
>
> As I understand it, what you are describing is technical data, not market
> data, which is commercial information (sales, prices, etc) but I’m sure
> others will correct me if I’m wrong.
>

So this would preclude "We called patent holder X and the royalty fee they
wanted to charge was prohibitive?"

-Ekr

Jay
>
>
> Ta,
> S.
> <OpenPGP_0xE4D8E9F997A833DD.asc>
>
>
> --
> Jay Daley
> IETF Executive Director
> exec-director@ietf.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> antitrust-policy mailing list
> antitrust-policy@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/antitrust-policy
>