IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] JSON Patch

Enrico Marocco <enrico.marocco@telecomitalia.it> Wed, 02 November 2011 09:13 UTC

Return-Path: <enrico.marocco@telecomitalia.it>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32BBC11E8113 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 02:13:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.719
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.719 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y8Oi3p1BXu4c for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 02:13:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from GRFEDG702BA020.telecomitalia.it (grfedg702ba020.telecomitalia.it [156.54.233.201]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BE4311E8100 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 02:13:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from GRFHUB701BA020.griffon.local (10.188.101.111) by GRFEDG702BA020.telecomitalia.it (10.188.45.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 10:13:02 +0100
Received: from MacLab.local (163.162.180.246) by smtp.telecomitalia.it (10.188.101.114) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 10:13:02 +0100
Message-ID: <4EB1099C.7090303@telecomitalia.it>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 10:13:00 +0100
From: Enrico Marocco <enrico.marocco@telecomitalia.it>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Paul C. Bryan" <paul.bryan@forgerock.com>
References: <1320187375.2622.25.camel@neutron>
In-Reply-To: <1320187375.2622.25.camel@neutron>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms060102030701040302070403"
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] JSON Patch
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 09:13:25 -0000

Hi Paul,

the need for such a mechanism periodically arises in the alto WG as a
means for providing incremental updates with the JSON-based protocol
that's being specified over there. I, for one, certainly support moving
this forward, possibly in a specifically chartered WG where usecases and
requirements from different contexts could be best evaluated.

Enrico

On 11/1/11 11:42 PM, Paul C. Bryan wrote:
> I have published and have been maintaining a JSON Patch Internet-Draft:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pbryan-json-patch-02
> 
> There's now at least three actively maintained implementations in as
> many programming languages. Interest has been expressed in moving this
> toward an RFC. I've discussed this briefly with Mark Nottingham, Pete
> Resnick and Peter Saint-Andre, and consensus seems to be to raise this
> with APPSAWG and see if there's any interest in developing this on a
> standards track.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email