IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] JSON Patch

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Thu, 10 November 2011 23:05 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A671F0C58 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:05:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.216
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.216 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.617, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8wdjM4zHaBrx for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:05:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 626051F0C50 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:05:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.6.129.79] (unknown [64.39.4.135]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7416E22E1FB; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 18:05:49 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <4EBBA0DD.9020605@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 17:05:51 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BD05E43F-9EB1-4B1B-8AF0-639355F55C0F@mnot.net>
References: <4EB1482E.1040600@adobe.com> <4EB14C2E.8040208@gmx.de> <1320254564.2622.37.camel@neutron> <4EBBA0DD.9020605@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] JSON Patch
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 23:05:57 -0000

On 10/11/2011, at 4:01 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> ...I'll have to ask :-). What about changing the notation for array elements to use [ and ]? More complexity in the expression language, but also more readability, I believe...

+1 -- I gave similar feedback.

--
Mark Nottingham
http://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email