Re: [apps-discuss] Review of draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme

Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net> Wed, 13 April 2016 14:21 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6210512DC1F; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 07:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gpuVW2ztdloD; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 07:21:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 872DB12DBD3; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 07:21:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.168] (76-218-8-128.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.8.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u3DELBgK015619 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 13 Apr 2016 07:21:11 -0700
References: <570D4C99.1030405@dcrocker.net> <CACweHND-OX+5okkJ+oE=6UN84x+CFtPBpMnU8HqaPbgQgJ_oWA@mail.gmail.com> <570E267A.2070801@ninebynine.org>
To: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>, Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <570E55CE.2010608@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 07:21:02 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <570E267A.2070801@ninebynine.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Wed, 13 Apr 2016 07:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/4_NbS9muFVtv5ZO7nG3ECVa73Zw>
Cc: Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Review of draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:21:16 -0000

On 4/13/2016 3:59 AM, Graham Klyne wrote:
>>> >A slash is required at the end of a directory, even if there is no file
>>> >name?
>>> >
>>> >
>> If you're using it as a directory then yes. If you're using it as the
>> ultimate object (the "file") then no. We defined "file" as an "object" in
>> the file system earlier, which (going with the UNIX interpretation that
>> everything is a file) can include directories. As far as I know most
>> non-UNIXy systems around today can deal with this interpretation too.
>> Should I spell it out, or leave it up to interpretation?
>>
>
> I'd also say "yes".
>
> This is an area where URI resolution works differently to file path
> resolution (on some systems), so it's not just an academic point.


There is enough history with yes-vs-no about terminating syntax 
characters -- cf, trailing dot in a domain name -- that it might help to 
include an emphasizing/clarifying comment exactly along the lines of 
Grahams text, just above.

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net