IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Spam reporting over IMAP

Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> Tue, 10 January 2012 01:56 UTC

Return-Path: <lyndon@orthanc.ca>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A49B1F0C3C for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:56:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IzsmBxKitq7t for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:56:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from orthanc.ca (orthanc.ca [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:8200:216:3eff:fe2c:dc8f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 920261F0C36 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:56:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pippin.orthanc.ca ([96.54.172.165]) (authenticated bits=0) by orthanc.ca (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0A1uNdN089200; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:56:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lyndon@orthanc.ca)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_66AA2BEC-67B4-41B7-8F8C-EADC8CBF4017"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca>
In-Reply-To: <20120110014726.81797.qmail@joyce.lan>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:56:16 -0800
Message-Id: <6D355995-85F3-4209-AED6-C6BD85D3CC8B@orthanc.ca>
References: <20120110014726.81797.qmail@joyce.lan>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Spam reporting over IMAP
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 01:56:25 -0000

On 2012-01-09, at 17:47 PM, John Levine wrote:

> AOL provides IMAP access to their mail system.  Each user has a folder
> called Spam.  Moving a message into the Spam folder is the equivalent
> of pushing the spam button in web mail.

No doubt.  But only, as you say, in *your* IMAP server.

SREP demands a ubiquitous solution.  One that will outlive AOL and Google's missions to destroy IMAP.   It's an autonomous service; let's give it an autonomous protocol.

--lyndon

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email