Re: [apps-discuss] FW: Spam reporting over IMAP

SM <> Thu, 19 January 2012 23:11 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 934D221F84CE; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:11:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.631
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.631 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.032, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZJD5Jc+ozvPD; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:11:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FEBA21F84C3; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:11:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from (IDENT:sm@localhost []) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0JNBWIM021712; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:11:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail2010; t=1327014698;; bh=8DjRiTad4JD6AIlDKjy0AKp8mU7iPAjzBPXmUx+SV9U=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=vhj7BdHi4ykbGkR65fyVMGCywUaUCK0a4uk4R3rJbI7U5MF7YtiP4V8yhQZzc120j 84sDmRpWyGACTy5eCuFrJ/By0wRl2pzcbbLHrrQ5ODqCwAEArg3SoBkciBMkS8Tidg Y2eGYlkedWqRR/zDgMROSTEhlBE1/xDUSqPo+MFQ=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail; t=1327014698;; bh=8DjRiTad4JD6AIlDKjy0AKp8mU7iPAjzBPXmUx+SV9U=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=gaBM5MGKdLOfy/lUTLD0veskfark3jKbh/dzoQcU+YFnPcOsYSdy3XlFz4MsybRbi XqH5X1s3rpcUGlVChO3XysUVxJEIZ9mY6TF8Ycw9pip2QEnR+KVfEHtVynNqMbvS8N 36LarFJTmEc0LwBu+Bt++SJOExNTmgM3CvyUBUFI=
Message-Id: <>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:11:02 -0800
To: Zoltan Ordogh <>
From: SM <>
In-Reply-To: < t>
References: <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Cc: ietf <>,
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] FW: Spam reporting over IMAP
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 23:11:41 -0000

Hi Zoltan,
At 14:10 19-01-2012, Zoltan Ordogh wrote:
>I understand the confusion has risen because my name is listed as an 
>author on draft-ordogh-spam-reporting-using-imap-kleansed-00.
>I would like to make it clear that while 
>draft-ordogh-spam-reporting-using-imap-kleansed-00 bears my name and 
>I am listed as the author of this, I was not involved - nor 
>consulted - on its development. I am of course happy to work with 
>anyone who wishes to progress either draft as long as the work gets 
>done in IETF. As I said before, if there

Thanks for the explanation.

>I noticed that a declaration has been made on 
>draft-ordogh-spam-reporting-using-imap-kleansed-00. This simple fact 
>should answer SM's question.

I would like to thank you and Research In Motion Limited for 
resolving the issue.