Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC: draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04.txt

Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> Wed, 04 May 2011 09:33 UTC

Return-Path: <simon@josefsson.org>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E14E072F for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 May 2011 02:33:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.29
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.291, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_32=0.6, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rdaET5uDcgqh for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 May 2011 02:33:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from yxa-v.extundo.com (yxa-v.extundo.com [213.115.69.139]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C0F7E06A2 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 May 2011 02:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from latte.josefsson.org (c80-216-4-108.bredband.comhem.se [80.216.4.108]) (authenticated bits=0) by yxa-v.extundo.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id p449XPtt003384 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 4 May 2011 11:33:26 +0200
From: Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>
To: Jiankang YAO <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
References: <503575952.18670@cnnic.cn> <504501195.20801@cnnic.cn>
OpenPGP: id=B565716F; url=http://josefsson.org/key.txt
X-Hashcash: 1:22:110504:idna-update@alvestrand.no::K9fcqDlFI5EI7j1W:0ed7
X-Hashcash: 1:22:110504:apps-discuss@ietf.org::nT+MgSYmPHlRdPvA:7gur
X-Hashcash: 1:22:110504:yaojk@cnnic.cn::cvJp+zklvyN4P7v3:cdAo
Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 11:33:24 +0200
In-Reply-To: <504501195.20801@cnnic.cn> (Jiankang YAO's message of "Wed, 4 May 2011 17:26:34 +0800")
Message-ID: <87mxj2kdy3.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at yxa-v
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Cc: idna-update@alvestrand.no, apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC: draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 09:33:48 -0000

"Jiankang YAO" <yaojk@cnnic.cn> writes:

> Reminder. The WG last call will end soon. If you still have any comments, pls
> kindly give it before the deadline.

Could you please clarify the last sentence in the WGLC?  As I asked
before, is the intention that this document will be marked as updating
any earlier RFC or not?  Right now the document does not include any
"Update:" tags, so I'm confused by your statement that the document
updates an earlier RFC.

Thanks,
/Simon

> Best regards,
> Jiankang Yao(as a co-chair of APPSAWG)
>
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Jiankang Yao 
>   To: apps-discuss@ietf.org 
>   Cc: idna-update@alvestrand.no 
>   Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2011 12:25 AM
>   Subject: [apps-discuss] WGLC: draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04.txt
>
>
>   Dear colleagues,
>
>   This message starts a two-week WGLC on the draft
>   draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04.txt.  We did formally
>   adopt this I-D as a WG document a few months ago.
>   There has a lot of discussion and an informal last call for comments about
>   this draft in the IDNAbis list idna-update@alvestrand.no.  
>   The editors/authors of this draft believe that this draft has been
> in a very good shape.
>
>   Please review the draft.  If you support publication, please state as
>   much on the list.  If you are opposed to publication, please state
>   that on the list as well.  It is more/only helpful if you give your
> reasons for
>   your position as part of your statement.  
>
>   Since this draft is the WG item of APPSAWG, we favor that the
> comments to this draft are sent to the list apps-discuss@ietf.org.
>
>   The WGLC will end on May 08, 2011 at 23:00 UTC.
>
>   Note: This draft is a document that updates an earlier RFC by
> stating nothing is to be updated.
>
>
>   Best regards,
>   Jiankang Yao(as a co-chair of APPSAWG)
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>   _______________________________________________
>   apps-discuss mailing list
>   apps-discuss@ietf.org
>   https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss