Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC: draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04.txt

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Simon Josefsson" <simon@josefsson.org>
To: "Jiankang YAO" <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
Cc: <idna-update@alvestrand.no>; <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 5:33 PM
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC: draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04.txt

> "Jiankang YAO" <yaojk@cnnic.cn> writes:
> 
>> Reminder. The WG last call will end soon. If you still have any comments, pls
>> kindly give it before the deadline.
> 
> Could you please clarify the last sentence in the WGLC?  
>

That sentence tries to express the meaning that the authors/editors try to deliver to the WG.
John C Klensin, the contributor of this document, has given the explanation of this sentense in response to your message, and Paul Hoffman, the co-editor/author of this document has confirmed it.

Thanks.

Jiankang Yao

>As I asked
> before, is the intention that this document will be marked as updating
> any earlier RFC or not?  
>

John has suggested that we should leave it to be decided by IESG.
Personally, I agree with his suggestion.

>
>Right now the document does not include any
> "Update:" tags, so I'm confused by your statement that the document
> updates an earlier RFC.
> 
> Thanks,
> /Simon
> 
>> Best regards,
>> Jiankang Yao(as a co-chair of APPSAWG)
>>
>>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>>   From: Jiankang Yao 
>>   To: apps-discuss@ietf.org 
>>   Cc: idna-update@alvestrand.no 
>>   Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2011 12:25 AM
>>   Subject: [apps-discuss] WGLC: draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04.txt
>>
>>
>>   Dear colleagues,
>>
>>   This message starts a two-week WGLC on the draft
>>   draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04.txt.  We did formally
>>   adopt this I-D as a WG document a few months ago.
>>   There has a lot of discussion and an informal last call for comments about
>>   this draft in the IDNAbis list idna-update@alvestrand.no.  
>>   The editors/authors of this draft believe that this draft has been
>> in a very good shape.
>>
>>   Please review the draft.  If you support publication, please state as
>>   much on the list.  If you are opposed to publication, please state
>>   that on the list as well.  It is more/only helpful if you give your
>> reasons for
>>   your position as part of your statement.  
>>
>>   Since this draft is the WG item of APPSAWG, we favor that the
>> comments to this draft are sent to the list apps-discuss@ietf.org.
>>
>>   The WGLC will end on May 08, 2011 at 23:00 UTC.
>>
>>   Note: This draft is a document that updates an earlier RFC by
>> stating nothing is to be updated.
>>
>>
>>   Best regards,
>>   Jiankang Yao(as a co-chair of APPSAWG)
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>   _______________________________________________
>>   apps-discuss mailing list
>>   apps-discuss@ietf.org
>>   https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
>> _______________________________________________
>> apps-discuss mailing list
>> apps-discuss@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss