IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC: draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04.txt

Paul Hoffman <phoffman@imc.org> Wed, 04 May 2011 14:00 UTC

Return-Path: <phoffman@imc.org>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A4AFE0719 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 May 2011 07:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fxUkTg2sKyVw for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 May 2011 07:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2001:4870:a30c:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48A7FE06A4 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 May 2011 07:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.151] (75-101-30-90.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [75.101.30.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p44DxvXx064259 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 4 May 2011 06:59:58 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from phoffman@imc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Paul Hoffman <phoffman@imc.org>
In-Reply-To: <15F3B045D9965C99C66CB2DE@PST.JCK.COM>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 06:59:57 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7BE91238-09AF-4935-8C9E-C15F27C34F7A@imc.org>
References: <503575952.18670@cnnic.cn> <504501195.20801@cnnic.cn> <87mxj2kdy3.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <15F3B045D9965C99C66CB2DE@PST.JCK.COM>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 04 May 2011 15:21:53 -0700
Cc: Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>, idna-update@alvestrand.no, apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC: draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 14:00:08 -0000

+1 to all of John's logic, and to his suggestion that we punt the decision to the IESG.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email