IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC: draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04.txt

Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> Thu, 05 May 2011 06:53 UTC

Return-Path: <simon@josefsson.org>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21CDE069F for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 May 2011 23:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.573
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.573 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.026, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mi-hryHrHVqQ for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 May 2011 23:52:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from yxa-v.extundo.com (yxa-v.extundo.com [213.115.69.139]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EEAAE0651 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 May 2011 23:52:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from latte.josefsson.org (c80-216-4-108.bredband.comhem.se [80.216.4.108]) (authenticated bits=0) by yxa-v.extundo.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id p456qd5x032087 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 5 May 2011 08:52:41 +0200
From: Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>
To: Jiankang YAO <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
References: <503575952.18670@cnnic.cn> <504501195.20801@cnnic.cn> <504501632.22118@cnnic.cn> <C87C95B1AB354FD2AA2AA53593C269C1__27930.7972094559$1304558026$gmane$org@LENOVO47E041CF>
OpenPGP: id=B565716F; url=http://josefsson.org/key.txt
X-Hashcash: 1:22:110505:yaojk@cnnic.cn::jU+dK85A5QIqc7On:7N0Q
X-Hashcash: 1:22:110505:apps-discuss@ietf.org::JngEKK/yWcrTtD1B:AO6b
X-Hashcash: 1:22:110505:idna-update@alvestrand.no::ZTrS41QJECtV1+A9:Y5o4
Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 08:52:39 +0200
In-Reply-To: <C87C95B1AB354FD2AA2AA53593C269C1__27930.7972094559$1304558026$gmane$org@LENOVO47E041CF> (Jiankang YAO's message of "Thu, 5 May 2011 09:13:30 +0800")
Message-ID: <87oc3hd4g8.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at yxa-v
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Cc: idna-update@alvestrand.no, apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC: draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 06:53:00 -0000

"Jiankang YAO" <yaojk@cnnic.cn> writes:

> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Simon Josefsson" <simon@josefsson.org>
> To: "Jiankang YAO" <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
> Cc: <idna-update@alvestrand.no>; <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 5:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC: draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04.txt
>
>
>> "Jiankang YAO" <yaojk@cnnic.cn> writes:
>> 
>>> Reminder. The WG last call will end soon. If you still have any comments, pls
>>> kindly give it before the deadline.
>> 
>> Could you please clarify the last sentence in the WGLC?  
>>
>
> That sentence tries to express the meaning that the authors/editors
> try to deliver to the WG.
> John C Klensin, the contributor of this document, has given the
> explanation of this sentense in response to your message, and Paul
> Hoffman, the co-editor/author of this document has confirmed it.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Jiankang Yao
>
>>As I asked
>> before, is the intention that this document will be marked as updating
>> any earlier RFC or not?  
>>
>
> John has suggested that we should leave it to be decided by IESG.
> Personally, I agree with his suggestion.

Thanks for response -- this seems fine to me as well.

/Simon

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email