IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC: draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04.txt

Stéphane Lancel <stelancel@gmail.com> Wed, 27 April 2011 15:56 UTC

Return-Path: <stelancel@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7262E07B0; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:56:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.298
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LzmDDQWeFucC; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:56:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFA49E070E; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:56:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxm15 with SMTP id 15so1436622fxm.31 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:56:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=V5KTDzf4WCPc/Eq/+Cum1FiWcic8FpgNvyDZwoOCWpc=; b=YTJhvM1AHdoPHbbARO2+meWrVSzqGoBT5bugsrIl5Wa+f4SrcyPm6XX3CH6TFnLZ05 Pa6dsDsjvyTPQUbhYi8OG3oQ5zdw6A3eOvkdwXal1QsdTcy9ZZRRp6+VOWEDFRXRJ3Es k7BCmMR7jwAgdsC15zjoI290E0viDFHNSVEOw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Ln3O6wM6t7KIjIIyj8f0QjvaUA1RLcSKLrX8rOdphchaIAb2vZX2ptOsL4QwCtLxOp jbKi+oLgblyuIM1IzrY+R1JRzLKojT/ZG3x9Dy5wTurkJBD3wlLAFyESlvrnfQRSK6RI Dkh3DzcFokb0LeSwjSZLrVIaFRGhh3VF2qSH4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.94.129 with SMTP id z1mr2604741fam.144.1303919775910; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.105.145 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20110427145800.GI7329@crankycanuck.ca>
References: <503575932.12389@cnnic.cn> <87mxjc21vi.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <BANLkTik9qxNX-rFL+2mmfxcZa2Hzn4teyw@mail.gmail.com> <20110427140644.GH7329@crankycanuck.ca> <BANLkTi=VvEgtqWuKJte+vDOBzFhsGg0L7w@mail.gmail.com> <20110427145800.GI7329@crankycanuck.ca>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 17:56:15 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTik53xzh=aMcX3s7021XOhHjkjTFxg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Stéphane Lancel <stelancel@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000e0ce0b1160f61e904a1e87b69"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:41:35 -0700
Cc: idna-update@alvestrand.no, internet users contributing group <iucg@ietf.org>, apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC: draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:56:17 -0000

Le 27 avril 2011 16:58, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com> a écrit :

> I think you're wrong in two ways.
>

No problem. I try to understand.

   " But IDNA2008 depends on Unicode and its properties.  If Unicode changes
properties such that something moves from PVALID to something else",

is that not a change in Unicode, i.e. a new version ?


> We wanted to be Unicode-version independent, and so that strategy doesn't
> meet the goal.
>

Here I am lost.



> Second, I don't think "at character level not at codepoint level" is right.
>  We're dealing in code points.
>

Yes, and their properties change for the same character ?

Best
S. Lancel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email