Re: [apps-discuss] Processing draft-bosch-sieve-duplicate via APPSAWG

Barry Leiba <> Wed, 22 May 2013 16:19 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BB9B21F8808; Wed, 22 May 2013 09:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.499
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.122, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, J_CHICKENPOX_23=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9s--U9ohY-it; Wed, 22 May 2013 09:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA72821F969F; Wed, 22 May 2013 09:19:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id ht10so1438783vcb.32 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 22 May 2013 09:19:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=qt8LaYP9/aS+d76G1ToKgT4p4lKUZ6tVnKatoPBp8d0=; b=qW4dmTmGJBCWFv0JQZbLP9uM0a8Y23RcoTscjjlDStfovU6J2/W4Ek5S0YyMR/ZC+u phWLqTaYM6gCQ/SeTswXTTqm30WAW5ADTBOoUJhYkZxrB05nTaf/mAZ37fcHcu9n7lnD 6K4CWsfOmVtTSjCKpwP4Ub9GN3ePTDY5GGPPXM3QU+rFFkYHrNsTT+vGNSdph5dwspQK kQ2wGC9IcstWNh0NaaJQnKs+uYnRXjM2lypjkrhXo/znXXjWkMzj6Y2HzNdQMyrytNT9 nuWSw6i/oW3yD0hQoz1kgkVLtIpwiqFWwwJm1IS4mANpEKQ+B2MRhx7juQ8ANgBJb7YL HV8A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by with SMTP id bs9mr3050037ved.38.1369239575171; Wed, 22 May 2013 09:19:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with HTTP; Wed, 22 May 2013 09:19:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <> <>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 12:19:35 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6NwujQn1EpLdwMgHCyn9KCaP8lQ
Message-ID: <>
From: Barry Leiba <>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: Sieve mailing list <>, IETF Apps Discuss <>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Processing draft-bosch-sieve-duplicate via APPSAWG
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 16:19:40 -0000

> I'd prefer the discussion happen here, but I don't feel strongly on the
> matter.
> However, I'd be happier if there were a few other reviewers/commenters in
> here that are willing to support the document through the process.  Now
> Cc:ing (when someone over there approves my post), can I get
> a couple more volunteers?

We always have a tricky situation when something belongs elsewhere as
well as on apps-discuss -- this has happened a few times as we've
branched off discussions (webfinger, json, dmarc), and will also
happen in cases such as imap and sieve stuff, as we try to bring it
into appsawg.  I think the best approach is to try to cross-post when
it's stuff that's relatively low volume (such as this), and to keep
apps-discuss periodically updated when it's higher volume (such as

We've now had reviews of this document Ned Freed, Aaron Stone, and Cyrus Daboo.  Alexey, too, as
shepherd.  And PSA has expressed approval for handling it in appsawg.
I've seen no objections, so I think that works for bringing it into
appsawg.  For review, if we could get a couple of other appsawg folks,
even some who are not otherwise involved with sieve, to review it as a
sanity check, we should be OK.  Claudio can help corral a couple of
reviewers through appsdir.

We might also specifically ask Arnt Gulbrandsen and Tim Showalter for
reviews, as formerly active Sieve folks.