Re: [apps-discuss] Looking at Webfinger

Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se> Thu, 30 August 2012 06:45 UTC

Return-Path: <paf@frobbit.se>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BB6D11E810A for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 23:45:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MYpbiaSxCZCy for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 23:44:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from srv01.frobbit.se (srv01.frobbit.se [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffe::39]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C9E11E80BA for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 23:44:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by srv01.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5BA815932E07; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:44:54 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at frobbit.se
Received: from srv01.frobbit.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (srv01.frobbit.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B9V5vHPhY7p2; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:44:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.12.176] (unknown [88.131.58.207]) (Authenticated sender: paf01) by srv01.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A77415932D74; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:44:52 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.0 \(1486\))
From: =?windows-1252?Q?Patrik_F=E4ltstr=F6m?= <paf@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <1346306587.53748.YahooMailNeo@web31804.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:44:52 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E5BBDB94-2D62-4A35-860A-22A466F88F5F@frobbit.se>
References: <F80C8C9C-7AB8-4B7E-BFD2-4D69499D21A1@mnot.net> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394366574F93@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <CABP7RbfNXx8HtsRBcVf=AVaDTyg=xQYHWAyCkHWx1n+JBQ8=Zw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwg20rfr=P66=vZadL8Ga5KDXmfizZE5v6dXiZMTvZKY=Q@mail.gmail.com> <44C43601-A355-44B7-8C8E-1F435E4E567A@ve7jtb.com> <CAMm+LwgM57++oqE-5meECxE0S=kU2kVHJLumyDSBciJ13QvuoA@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7RbctkibSKr6r_Ay34z4Wr67tU6qG5G5gLCZovGx_hWYHYQ@mail.gmail.com> <DF4591C5-A5AE-4D2A-BB3A-FF4DAFBBD98A@ve7jtb.com> <CABP7RbefS9Sy2m0GsiSx2VZopf78DhqU1fjfsDn5z926Q_--GA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJu8rwUeAKEtAS-g6X3xJqyu-Xy6yQnfdeNj3mGC__D3zijwzA@mail.gmail.com> <35550AA9-E003-4917-B08C-93CB6CC2CB07@mnot.net> <CAJu8rwWKa7ehr+k=zDWD=OMzPTEt56inPW0tvZaNUmdcL3ygoQ@mail.gmail.com> <503CDF26.8050000@aol.com> <02a301cd8551$be7ab390$3b701ab0$@packetizer.com> <3BE24613-9CA0-4B2C-AB33-274026D534FB@ve7jtb.com> <032d01cd8597$aac7f740$0057e5c0$@packetizer.com> <046501cd860c$da464420$8ed2cc60$@packe! tizer.com> <287CDD14-DE C2-40AD-AD5D-DC102D5AAAE6@ve7jtb.com> <CAJu8rwX=F8o8U2tv3vJbL+p2dnGVGDtccKOk+ukn4jtSXNwDxg@mail.gmail.com> <04f001cd8627$092727e0$1b7577a0$@packetizer.com> <90420743-8FE8-4EDB-98EF-D717D5346397@frobbit.se> <1346306587.53748.YahooMailNeo@web31804.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
To: William Mills <wmills@yahoo-inc.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1486)
Cc: 'Mark Nottingham' <mnot@mnot.net>, 'IETF Apps Discuss' <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Looking at Webfinger
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 06:45:28 -0000

First, I did not talk about SRV records, but URI records.

Secondly, I think it is fascinating that people that love new things like "the web" and new HTML5 features are the most conservative ones regarding other protocols like DNS.

With that attitude, we have no evolution, and no innovation.

Providers that do not support such features will die. It is that simple.

   Patrik

On 30 aug 2012, at 08:03, William Mills <wmills@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:

> There are a few folks that feel that SRV records are not really an option for hosting situatiosn where the users don't currently have the ability to configure SRV records.
> 
> From: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
> To: Paul E. Jones <paulej@packetizer.com> 
> Cc: 'Mark Nottingham' <mnot@mnot.net>et>; 'IETF Apps Discuss' <apps-discuss@ietf.org> 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 8:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Looking at Webfinger
> 
> On 29 aug 2012, at 22:44, Paul E. Jones <paulej@packetizer.com> wrote:
> 
> > 1) TXT records (e.g., _webfinger.packetizer.com IN TXT “https://packetizer.webfinger-provider.com/”)
> 
> Please see URI Resource Record, for example:
> 
> _webfinger._tcp.packetizer.com. IN URI 0 0 “https://packetizer.webfinger-provider.com/”
> 
>   Patrik
> 
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
> 
>