IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Review of draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-14

"Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Wed, 06 June 2012 00:28 UTC

Return-Path: <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706B411E80AE for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 17:28:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.465
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.465 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.325, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id byROxISy08DF for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 17:28:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.253.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C35311E80AB for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 17:28:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.253.231]) by scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id q560Rtes027796 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 09:27:55 +0900
Received: from (unknown [133.2.206.133]) by scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp with smtp id 0837_65a6_75775f58_af6e_11e1_8df3_001d096c5782; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 09:27:54 +0900
Received: from [IPv6:::1] ([133.2.210.1]:41805) by itmail.it.aoyama.ac.jp with [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server] id <S15CE9A8> for <apps-discuss@ietf.org> from <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 09:27:58 +0900
Message-ID: <4FCEA408.2000009@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 09:27:52 +0900
From: "\"Martin J. Dürst\"" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100722 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20120521130747.0c219ab0@elandnews.com> <4FBDF199.2050300@isode.com> <4FC722A2.2050905@dcrocker.net> <4FC89931.5060201@isode.com> <4FC914DB.4000806@dcrocker.net> <4FCA6BFE.3050609@isode.com> <4FCD175D.30307@dcrocker.net> <01OGAJ8GBR2Q0006TF@mauve.mrochek.com> <4FCDF13F.3000106@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <4FCDF13F.3000106@dcrocker.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority.all@tools.ietf.org, Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, iesg@ietf.org, apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Review of draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-14
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:28:16 -0000

On 2012/06/05 20:45, Dave Crocker wrote:

> The modification for some prioritization -- the role-based usage that's
> been cited -- is protracted declining of service to lower rank
> originators. That's no longer 'queuing' in an operational sense, it's a
> termination of service for some. Besides the military example, that's
> what happens for telephone emergency mode, as I understand it.

That's definitely what happened in Japan after the 2011-03-11 
earthquake, and to a lesser extent in other situations.

Regards,   Martin.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email