Re: [aqm] WG status

[David Collier-Brown <[e-mail]>]

I'll have a look and see if I can contribute.  --dave


On 01/08/2014 03:06 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> I have a doc shepard/researcher working with me to nail down cites
> from the 70s and 80s. First up however was finding direct web
> references to everything cited in the existing  drafts.
>
> Alaric found links to everything missing and modified the existing
> drafts to suit. I don't know how the various authors would like the
> changes (?) - diffs can be had from the bufferbloat-rfcs repository in
> github:
> https://github.com/dtaht/bufferbloat-rfcs - there were only about 10
> URLs added.
>
> Still struggling with xml2rfc and pandoc2rfc here...
>
> On Jan 8, 2014 2:46 PM, "Wesley Eddy" <[e-mail]
> <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>
>     Hi, as we've entered 2014 and have charter milestones that we're
>     working towards, Richard and I thought it would be good to start
>     periodically sending a "status report" to the WG mailing list so
>     that we can all keep up with what's going on, and focus our efforts
>     together on the things that need work.
>
>     Towards that goal, here is a snapshot of where we think the AQM
>     working group is at today, and what the next steps are that people
>     can contribute to:
>
>
>     - WG Milestones:
>       - Submit AQM recommendations to IESG for publication, obsoleting RFC
>     2309 (Goal: January 2014)
>         - draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation is accepted towards this milestone
>         - http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation/
>         - the draft needs to be updated per comments received, including
>     feedback on the recommendations from the Vancouver meeting
>         - if the authors are comfortable, a WGLC might be made on the next
>     revision
>         - we would like to hear from other authors of RFC 2309 on this
>     document, if anyone has contacts to them.
>
>       - Submit AQM algorithm evaluation guidelines to IESG for publication
>     as Informational (Goal: July 2014)
>         - We need an editor team to step forward and begin work on this;
>     there was initial work presented in Vancouver, but no draft
>     available or
>     adopted by the working group yet.
>         - It will be difficult to make this milestone, and will push other
>     milestones back, if this work isn't accelerated.
>         - Please express interest to the chairs or on-list
>
>       - Submit first algorithm specification to IESG for publication as
>     Proposed Standard (Goal: December 2014)
>         - Since any Proposed Standard algorithm should be in line with the
>     recommendations and be passable versus the evaluation guidelines, this
>     milestone is hard to start on without significant progress on the
>     previous two.
>         - Currently the only algorithm spec with a complete and active
>     individual-submission draft is PIE
>
>     - Other items:
>       - draft-pan-aqm-pie is under active work as a proposed algorithm:
>         http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-pan-aqm-pie-00.txt
>       - CoDel draft is expired; Dave Taht or others may revive it and/or
>     describe pairing with FQ/SFQ algorithms:
>         http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nichols-tsvwg-codel-01.txt
>       - Other algorithm specifications are welcome!
>         - Though, we are not planning on adopting algorithms until
>     recommendations and evaluation guidelines are mostly stable
>
>
>     --
>     Wes Eddy
>     MTI Systems
>     _______________________________________________
>     aqm mailing list
>     [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aqm mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm


-- 
David Collier-Brown,         | Always do right. This will gratify
System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest
[e-mail]           |                      -- Mark Twain
[phone]