Re: [aqm] [AQM Evaluation Guidelines]

Thank you Nicolas, and of course also all the other editors for preparing this document!

We will dedicate a significant fraction of the meeting time in London on discussing this document, so I would like to encourage you all to review this version!

Best regards,

Richard Scheffenegger

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nicolas KUHN [mailto:nicolas.kuhn@telecom-bretagne.eu]
> Sent: Freitag, 07. Februar 2014 12:58
> To: Scheffenegger, Richard
> Cc: aqm@ietf.org
> Subject: [AQM Evaluation Guidelines]
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> On the behalf of the contributors to the AQM Evaluation Guidelines, I
> encourage active discussion on the draft that we have written.
> I just submitted the draft as an individual draft to the I-D Submission
> Tool [0].
> 
> Please let us know what you think of the current document.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Nicolas KUHN
> 
> [0] http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kuhn-aqm-eval-guidelines/
> 
> 
> On Feb 5, 2014, at 10:01 PM, "Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs@netapp.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > a new month, a new status report.
> >
> > First of all, Wes and I as chairs would like to thank the editors who
> have stepped forward to work on the AQM Evaluation Guideline draft. We are
> really thankful for their burst of efforts in the last couple weeks!
> >
> > We expect that that a document will be ready for submission into the I-D
> repository well before cutoff, as an individual draft, so that the WG can
> see what the state of thinking is currently. Also, once the document is
> published on datatracker we'd like to encourage active discussion on it.
> >
> > If the submitted -00 draft is felt to have a fairly complete outline of
> what the current thinking in the WG is, we may be able to ask the WG for
> formal adoption during this IETF meeting, or shortly thereafter.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > - WG Milestones:
> >   - Submit AQM recommendations to IESG for publication, obsoleting RFC
> > 2309 (Goal: January 2014)
> >     - draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation is accepted towards this milestone
> >     - http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation/
> >     - the draft has been updated per comments received
> >     - if the authors are comfortable, a WGLC might be made on the next
> > revision
> >     - we would like to hear from other authors of RFC 2309 on this
> > document, if anyone has contacts to them.
> >
> >
> >   - Submit AQM algorithm evaluation guidelines to IESG for publication
> > as Informational (Goal: July 2014)
> >     - An editor team has come forth and is working on this
> >     - A draft should be available for discussion in the London IETF
> >     - We encourage discussion on the list and during the meeting, if
> this
> >        draft should be adopted by the working group.
> >
> >   - Submit first algorithm specification to IESG for publication as
> > Proposed Standard (Goal: December 2014)
> >     - Since any Proposed Standard algorithm should be in line with the
> > recommendations and be passable versus the evaluation guidelines, this
> > milestone is dependend on the progress of the two work items above.
> >     - Currently the only algorithm spec with a complete and active
> > individual-submission draft is PIE
> >
> > - Other items:
> >   - draft-pan-aqm-pie is under active work as a proposed algorithm:
> >     http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-pan-aqm-pie-00.txt, however the draft
> >     has expired and should be refreshed.
> >   - draft-nichols-tsvwg-codel is expired; Dave Taht or others may
> > revive it and/or describe pairing with FQ/SFQ algorithms:
> >     http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nichols-tsvwg-codel-01.txt
> >   - Other algorithm specifications are welcome!
> >     - Though, we are not planning on adopting algorithms until
> > recommendations and evaluation guidelines are mostly stable
> >
> >
> > Richard Scheffenegger
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aqm mailing list
> > aqm@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm