IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [arch-d] I-D Action: draft-iab-protocol-maintenance-08.txt

Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Fri, 15 July 2022 02:45 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44BB9C16ECA5 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 19:45:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.328
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.328 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d3V-qKR15eO8 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 19:45:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-2.web-hosting.com (server217-2.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7976AC16ECB1 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 19:45:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Sender: Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender :Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=KY/AwkKrvVT9zisU/1IaOYAVHd3zSSXhqTj3nf0GB7Q=; b=VvE0CCebyr4+hCco1gOd9kNUHx yyRKZgvn1esVqAJ/zwZe5ongQ50eUvyS2JgKTWNBY9VS+rGZECEC+Pe+wdzs/ol7jHMPCmdp/pCwW SMv7oiG3wsCIjJDBoIz+8mIZL7p+bKLVL8sieGlovLz87upDNXSF2csOQzJvJ2hre3lGAb9ushPay pveEbcRavTzGyo3orLtWpEWZ9qeShVFOtHwSNveTotMLB9dIAuCJr7YcaBlnu966k4MXJjm95Vou0 TSrfMpSj5FO0cVqw+jjKHg04Cv/+zvSeMz3J+t72CHq7Q4h5Kj0jo/MTnQEpoz6oO8SA5Oeh47Qz9 atAozSSA==;
Received: from [172.58.17.241] (port=25743 helo=smtpclient.apple) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1oCBKA-00AV0V-CE; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 22:45:06 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <0f77119c-e015-4484-adae-7118262bad70@beta.fastmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 19:44:59 -0700
Cc: "Bless, Roland (TM)" <roland.bless@kit.edu>, architecture-discuss@ietf.org
Message-Id: <1AA04DF4-5145-466C-ACA1-F1153D666212@strayalpha.com>
References: <0f77119c-e015-4484-adae-7118262bad70@beta.fastmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (19F77)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/L29sVyJ_S9uv-5U-3v0eRHIifsY>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] I-D Action: draft-iab-protocol-maintenance-08.txt
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 02:45:36 -0000


> On Jul 14, 2022, at 5:01 PM, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote:
> 
> The central point is that the very concept itself (as Joe stated it) is not a good basis for building a protocol ecosystem

It’s not the basis. It’s a rule for handling cases that are or could be ambiguous, which no one can ever completely avoid. 

If you try to use it as THE basis, you will get in trouble. But nobody ever said to do that, imo including Jon. 

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email