Re: [arch-d] The Internet Architecture for Pandemics/Emergencies/Crises

"wjgo_10009@btinternet.com" <wjgo_10009@btinternet.com> Sun, 10 May 2020 17:47 UTC

Return-Path: <wjgo_10009@btinternet.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6302E3A0ACE for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 May 2020 10:47:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btinternet.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X8FG1fI1V54G for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 May 2020 10:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rgout0807.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (rgout0807.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk [65.20.0.154]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3836C3A0A98 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 May 2020 10:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-OWM-Source-IP: 10.110.12.1 ()
X-OWM-Env-Sender: wjgo_10009@btinternet.com
X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean
X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0
X-VadeSecure-score: verdict=clean score=0/300, class=clean
X-SNCR-VADESECURE: CLEAN
X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0
X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean
X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrkeekgdduudelucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuueftkffvkffujffvgffngfevqffopdfqfgfvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefvkfgjfhfugggtfghihfffsegrtdersgdtreejnecuhfhrohhmpedffihjghhopgdutddttdelsegsthhinhhtvghrnhgvthdrtghomhdfuceofihjghhopgdutddttdelsegsthhinhhtvghrnhgvthdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepveelheeiheffveehuefffffglefffefftdellefflefhvefgieetfffgieejleeknecuffhomhgrihhnpehunhhitghouggvrdhorhhgpdhglhhosggrlhhnvghtrdgtohdruhhkpdhunhhvrdhorhhgpdhjlhdrlhihpdhivghtfhdrohhrghenucfkphepuddtrdduuddtrdduvddruddpvddujedrgeefrdejfedrudeivdenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopeifvggsmhgrihhlvddtrdgsthdrvgigthdrtghptghlohhuugdrtghordhukhdpihhnvghtpedutddruddutddruddvrddupdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepoeifjhhgohgpuddttddtleessghtihhnthgvrhhnvghtrdgtohhmqedprhgtphhtthhopeeorghrtghhihhtvggtthhurhgvqdguihhstghushhssehivghtfhdrohhrgheqpdhrtghpthhtohepoehgshgvnhhophhusehgmhgr ihhlrdgtohhmqedprhgtphhtthhopeeojhgvrghnjhhouhhrsegtohhmtggrshhtrdhnvghtqedprhgtphhtthhopeeojhhohhhnlhesthgruhhghhdrtghomheqpdhrtghpthhtohepoehsmhdoihgvthhfsegvlhgrnhgushihshdrtghomheqpdhrtghpthhtohepoehtthgvsegtshdrfhgruhdruggvqe
Received: from webmail20.bt.ext.cpcloud.co.uk (10.110.12.1) by rgout08.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (9.0.019.26-1) (authenticated as wjgo_10009@btinternet.com) id 5BC47A871F3EB6FC; Sun, 10 May 2020 18:46:30 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1589132827; bh=5L6nNWHOD7VuSweLYIA9PAqQAs0Dblqq3Mtq8gJkt/Y=; h=To:Cc:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:MIME-Version:From:Date; b=kByw+pU4DqcxXSL1QTcLKhkL+DGwBGCqSiy4uyoJc9DNq1xyN7Zrq9CgjsHbPavYq2EAe7XKwd8qxLLO8xFgeApBKzhyx+fARmEmA4pjlWyKlP92IjaCWUiB4WQEPqiNZtwdEs+H21Nv6mLxY9E+DPa0ikyuCRPE63ZyMgwYOBs=
Received: from [217.43.73.162] by ux.btmail.bt.com with HTTP; Sun, 10 May 2020 18:46:29 +0100
To: Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com>, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, jeanjour@comcast.net, sm+ietf@elandsys.com, tte@cs.fau.de
Cc: "architecture-discuss@ietf.org" <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <49d1ec61.139f.171ffb208eb.Webtop.211@btinternet.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKi_AEtcRgAgXjH=NTcpy0ZN92xpXhtS6Ht8C5FF+ir6OGyM7A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKi_AEtez4BsCbNJ=avUC6bPhz8uXuttBQ_BRQu7izNXiEs6qA@mail.gmail.com> <20200508153318.GK62020@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <r972b4$439$1@gal.iecc.com> <CAKi_AEtcRgAgXjH=NTcpy0ZN92xpXhtS6Ht8C5FF+ir6OGyM7A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_40916_253899961.1589132789877"
User-Agent: OWM Mail 3
X-SID: 211
X-Originating-IP: [217.43.73.162]
From: "wjgo_10009@btinternet.com" <wjgo_10009@btinternet.com>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 18:46:29 +0100 (BST)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/QpPStD86OzF_4PntLIxdivUeqiM>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] The Internet Architecture for Pandemics/Emergencies/Crises
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 17:47:14 -0000

Hi

I don't know if this is relevant but I will ask you to decide please, 
just in case it is relevant.
https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2020/20078-n4710-liaison-stmt.pdf
https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2020/20136-sc2-response.pdf
These are linked from
https://www.unicode.org/L2/L-curdoc.htm
Also, my research on communicating through the language barrier may 
possibly be relevant, as I have a small study on seeking information 
about relatives and friends through the language barrier after a 
disaster.
http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~ngo/localizable_sentences_research.htm
William Overington
Sunday 10 May 2020


------ Original Message ------
From: "Guntur Wiseno Putra" <gsenopu@gmail.com>
To: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>om>; tte@cs.fau.de; 
jeanjour@comcast.net; sm+ietf@elandsys.com
Cc: "architecture-discuss@ietf.org" <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
Sent: Sunday, 2020 May 10 At 14:55
Subject: [arch-d] The Internet Architecture for 
Pandemics/Emergencies/Crises
Dear John Day, Toerless,
S. Moonesamy, John Levine &
architecture-discuss,



Those the ISOC-sponsored organizations will perhaps be at field together 
with this UN-sponsored initiative --especially with people of 
"communication and management"-- to work on the Internet 
(architecture--if there are emergencies)-related problems:


Volunteers for Novel Coronavirus (Covid 19) Pandemic Response


https://www.unv.org/Volunteers-for-Novel-Coronavirus-COVID-19-pandemic-response 
<https://www.unv.org/Volunteers-for-Novel-Coronavirus-COVID-19-pandemic-response>




This page said among others on how the pandemic affected essential 
public services: a matter of which it is perhaps about the Internet 
deployments...?


NOTE:


Critical points of the news blog "What Does A Global Pandemic Means for 
the Internet?" I referred to at the previous message:


"The Internet has long been a connector beyond the physical. Now, it’s 
the only reason people are able to see their faraway loved ones and 
complete remote projects with their coworkers amid pandemic-prompted 
social distancing. It’s a great moment for the technology...":

- the Internet access at home.

- a secure way to communicate....

- innovative ways using the Internet to communicate: people are 
realizing the importance of the Internet

- funds for broadband infrastructures

- engineering networks

- traffic, platform, infrastructure

- cybersecurity: platforms and services, privacy, phishing 
attack/malware

- we are learning



Regard,
Guntur Wiseno Putra
Pada Minggu, 10 Mei 2020, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com 
<mailto:johnl@taugh.com> > menulis:
In article <20200508153318.GK62020@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de 
<mailto:20200508153318.GK62020@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> >,
  Toerless Eckert  <tte@cs.fau.de <mailto:tte@cs.fau.de> > wrote:
  >... to me the ISOC call for proposals looks like
  >very much baked to favour established administrative entities (must 
be
  >able to have track record to manage the money). Aka: I fear it will
  >exclude core technical innovators that have not managed to build up
  >a bureaucracy large enough to deal with money that way. Too bad.
  >
  >Managing the money is a service that ISOC should be able to provide
  >to innovators.

  I expect it won't be a surprise to hear that since the ISOC foundation
  is in the U.S., it has to follow U.S. law.

  Also, 501(c)(3) is not very difficult to qualify for.  There are over
  a million registered non-profits in the U.S., and while a few are
  large, 75% of them have annual budgets under $50K.

  --
  Regards,
  John Levine, johnl@taugh.com <mailto:johnl@taugh.com> , Primary 
Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
  Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. 
https://jl.ly <https://jl.ly>

  _______________________________________________
  Architecture-discuss mailing list
  Architecture-discuss@ietf.org <mailto:Architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss 
<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>


  _______________________________________________
Architecture-discuss mailing list
Architecture-discuss@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss 
<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>