Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragmentation: 2023-05-03
Dominique Lazanski <dml@lastpresslabel.com> Tue, 02 May 2023 11:02 UTC
Return-Path: <dml@lastpresslabel.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44861C151B20 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 May 2023 04:02:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, MPART_ALT_DIFF=0.79, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lastpresslabel-com.20221208.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3cR0MedGmyB4 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 May 2023 04:02:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42f.google.com (mail-wr1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8E73C151B1A for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 May 2023 04:02:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3063b5f32aaso83613f8f.2 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 May 2023 04:02:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lastpresslabel-com.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1683025369; x=1685617369; h=to:in-reply-to:cc:references:message-id:date:subject:mime-version :from:content-transfer-encoding:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=vPCCSqQYua46gR+l9PkF0OgZIJ96l2HenyBVb5IG4g8=; b=0b6bN+wo+oImiYhB+8sIY4I7Iw3kMS4i+88C05KQc0ziJ1UuhOG7YjCf26Q+glMfS7 jv+t+ssNPfww8hB2P1JqTd0eDMKAsRN7xU4Hev3qoOg46hhtqoemSIRlbOur6wdJg6mG RcpJcZAiCnhPNQspnGJGHr1yI5wA1Ubs8KD11wLuQF2TKz9rIn2GG7bpyNXf54Ti4F4x SVThUW8SHEso1qo4qyDzOAEgcsxWKuttAT/vMgMeYIxOMqkahRDR5zM6JO8F74xbAPlZ OikDoQjUFA39yQzhpHBaq7SyDGI/HoPXzqLuvkvORzpmWEFPaPwXfffS05skdoO2uKAM 0kfw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1683025369; x=1685617369; h=to:in-reply-to:cc:references:message-id:date:subject:mime-version :from:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vPCCSqQYua46gR+l9PkF0OgZIJ96l2HenyBVb5IG4g8=; b=Vc7xapVH4myBWBA+UNYiR3xclFfWpaeEQ481iWEulDn/r1AxoRI1fQUEKzPAmru3rV 0H8+YeKqaGpQAjj00G/f2EYYXlujDWBZ+gvgMhbJ2oz/IrWdX0VMgQ0tqmy434ntmKAQ H/3byAt4hCx6TjAUJigpcDgOR3aRuk8SP+MdbN2wW9DiDDxwCRUsYILoFZmO020NNhEX /KYJ5UFk24+Owb4z7kJ+H9FpmBAXGSGxV0kN37wDtiYM34EbSZAm8+aMRV+Z0Kds9wEl KQJY4BF16VzbTGfoHAU1kUCk7prULrpiFdpI/r+hBdoYhdTIQgYJo3dwuwP4CipHR5oc GYMw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDzYbpRjQwNUuNuRG/bj9BLfvYvcXGnCu8rW5cQC4ptBB8fVGVFJ iXXmvBQG1PFZnGaVhBEoZLiosg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ7md/0juqLvX6R3sni+l4IWAjqptRdEJq5QcsFwLt3aKxG3zVAjtMyLa9cPu8JuIWV/Do87BQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5956:0:b0:304:b1da:77d with SMTP id e22-20020a5d5956000000b00304b1da077dmr11477998wri.52.1683025369476; Tue, 02 May 2023 04:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([148.252.129.40]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k9-20020a5d6e89000000b0030629536e64sm6847134wrz.30.2023.05.02.04.02.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 02 May 2023 04:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-B431B564-5EFB-4033-819C-BF560A6D5E18"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dominique Lazanski <dml@lastpresslabel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Tue, 02 May 2023 12:02:38 +0100
Message-Id: <CB03498A-20A1-482B-A088-B032391DBBA2@lastpresslabel.com>
References: <680069303.5441.1683023514937@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com>
Cc: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, iab@iab.org
In-Reply-To: <680069303.5441.1683023514937@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com>
To: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola=40open-xchange.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (20E252)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/U1-17n4L5xmjvRghjOrU-rhbh1A>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragmentation: 2023-05-03
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 May 2023 11:02:52 -0000
On 2 May 2023, at 11:38, Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola=40open-xchange.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
Il 28/04/2023 23:54 CEST Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com> ha scritto:Bob,I also had the same initial thought. And I've even got an RFC discussing pseudowire fragmentation, so I was looking forward to an IP fragmentation discussion!I guess this is part of the current, extensive effort by the I* organisations (mostly ISOC and ICANN) to counter any renewed proposals for a different governance structure for the key technical resources of the Internet, i.e. names and numbers (did anyone say ITU?).However, there is some ambiguity on whether this also extends to regulation at the application layer, like the recent efforts in Europe to establish rules that would force the global Internet industry to tailor their services to specific European norms (this may go as far, to give you an example of a current discussion, to require AI models to be able to forget all information they learned about a specific European citizen, which of course is not technically easy; but it also includes pro-competition measures against walled gardens, requirements for large online information platforms, and, more controversially, proposals to mandate the screening of personal messages for CSAM).I am curious to see how the IAB defines "fragmentation" - this is an ongoing discussion at the already mentioned IGF PNIF - and thus what is the scope of this "technical discussion". Personally, I would encourage the IAB to stay out of the latter set of problems, as there is almost nothing technical in them - it's all about policy, values, interests and compromises.Ciao,_______________________________________________--
Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange
vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com
Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy
Architecture-discuss mailing list
Architecture-discuss@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss
- [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragmentatio… IAB Executive Administrative Manager
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragment… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragment… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragment… Hesham ElBakoury
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragment… Bob Hinden
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragment… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragment… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragment… Dominique Lazanski
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragment… Arnaud Taddei
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragment… Eliot Lear
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragment… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragment… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragment… Arnaud Taddei
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragment… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragment… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [arch-d] [EXT] Re: IAB Technical Discussion o… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragment… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragment… Arnaud Taddei
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragment… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragment… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragment… Arnaud Taddei
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragment… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragment… Arnaud Taddei
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragment… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragment… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragment… Hesham ElBakoury
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragment… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragment… Tommy Pauly
- [arch-d] Splintering (fragmentation) vs Centraliz… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [arch-d] [EXTERNAL] Re: IAB Technical Discuss… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [arch-d] [IAB] IAB Technical Discussion on Fr… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragment… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [arch-d] Splintering (fragmentation) vs Centr… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [arch-d] Splintering (fragmentation) vs Centr… Arnaud Taddei
- Re: [arch-d] Splintering (fragmentation) vs Centr… Toerless Eckert
- [arch-d] public recordings of IAB meetings or not… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [arch-d] public recordings of IAB meetings or… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [arch-d] Splintering (fragmentation) vs Centr… Christian Huitema
- Re: [arch-d] Splintering (fragmentation) vs Centr… Dominique Lazanski
- Re: [arch-d] Splintering (fragmentation) vs Centr… Tony Li
- Re: [arch-d] Splintering (fragmentation) vs Centr… David R. Oran
- Re: [arch-d] Splintering (fragmentation) vs Centr… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [arch-d] Splintering (fragmentation) vs Centr… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [arch-d] public recordings of IAB meetings or… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [arch-d] public recordings of IAB meetings or… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [arch-d] Splintering (fragmentation) vs Centr… Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [arch-d] [IAB] Splintering (fragmentation) vs… Colin Perkins
- Re: [arch-d] public recordings of IAB meetings or… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [arch-d] Splintering (fragmentation) vs Centr… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [arch-d] Splintering (fragmentation) vs Centr… Hesham ElBakoury
- Re: [arch-d] Splintering (fragmentation) vs Centr… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [arch-d] Splintering (fragmentation) vs Centr… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragment… Watson Ladd
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragment… Hesham ElBakoury
- Re: [arch-d] Splintering (fragmentation) vs Centr… Hesham ElBakoury
- Re: [arch-d] Splintering (fragmentation) vs Centr… Arnaud Taddei
- Re: [arch-d] Splintering (fragmentation) vs Centr… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [arch-d] [EXT] Re: IAB Technical Discussion o… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [arch-d] Splintering (fragmentation) vs Centr… Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [arch-d] Splintering (fragmentation) vs Centr… Hesham ElBakoury
- Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragment… Hesham ElBakoury
- Re: [arch-d] [EXT] Re: IAB Technical Discussion o… Brian E Carpenter