Re: [Autoconf] aspects of multi-hop wireless communication

["Teco Boot" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Emmanual and Charles,

Thanks for the efforts. 
I like the compactness of the draft.


Maybe mention alternate terminology “uni-directional” for "asymmetric" ?
As discussed before, asymmetry is also used for different link qualities
for A to B and B to A, where A and B have a symmetric relation.


> - We may say that router B is a neighbor of router A. In this
>   terminology, there is no guarantee that router A is a neighbor of
>   router B.

In this case, the neighbor table of router B would list router A.
So I say router A is neighbor of router B, and there is no guarantee
that router B is a neighbor of router A.
Or I say the relation between neighbors is symmetric, but some neighbors 
may not be aware of this.


Regards, Teco


===
Van: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] Namens
Emmanuel Baccelli
Verzonden: vrijdag 19 december 2008 10:19
Aan: [e-mail]
Onderwerp: [Autoconf] aspects of multi-hop wireless communication

Hi all,

here's a draft that aims at describing important aspects of multi-hop
wireless communication, as observed over the past decade of experience with
such networks.

The goal of this document is to identify a consensus about this topic, and
then use this to move on quicker with the working group documents.

Please review it, and provide feedback as soon as possible. 

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baccelli-multi-hop-wireless-communication-0
0

cheers
Emmanuel

_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf