Re: [Autoconf] aspects of multi-hop wireless communication

[Alexandru Petrescu <[e-mail]>]

Teco Boot wrote:
> |>>> First, there is no guarantee that a router C within S can,
> |>>> symmetrically, send IP packets directly to router A. In other words,
> |>>> even though C can "hear" packets from node A (since it is a member
> |of
> |>>> set S), there is no guarantee that A can "hear" packets from node C.
> |>
> |>> Sorry, could one mention why?  What's the example of this?
> |>
> |> The simplest example (but by no means the only) is different power
> |> levels transmitted by A and C.
> |
> |And isn't it the same for wired communications ?  (and would a potential
> |solution to this to have the same power levels transmitted by A and C?)
> 
> One other reason is noise levels.
> 
> Alex, if you can provide a noise suppression device, please send me one.

There's noise in the wires as well and gets supressed by PHY and MAC.

Not sure whatkind of solutions you think are designable.

Alex

> 
> Teco.
> 
> 
> 


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf