Re: [Autoconf] aspects of multi-hop wireless communication

["Teco Boot" <[e-mail]>]

> - We may say that router B is a neighbor of router A. In this
>   terminology, there is no guarantee that router A is a neighbor of
>   router B.

In this case, the neighbor table of router B would list router A.
So I say router A is neighbor of router B, and there is no guarantee
that router B is a neighbor of router A.
Or I say the relation between neighbors is symmetric, but some neighbors
may not be aware of this.

 

 

OK, I think I see what you mean: you are saying that since B hears A, the
text should rather be:

"A is neighbor of router B, and there is no guarantee that router B is a
neighbor of router A"

Am I correct?

 

Yes, but others could prefer the original text. 

If so, I am interested in the protocol that implement such.

If there is no such implementation, please update the text.

 

Teco.

_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf