Re: [Autoconf] aspects of multi-hop wireless communication

[Alexandru Petrescu <[e-mail]>]

Dearlove, Christopher (UK) wrote:
>>> First, there is no guarantee that a router C within S can, 
>>> symmetrically, send IP packets directly to router A. In other words, 
>>> even though C can "hear" packets from node A (since it is a member of
>>> set S), there is no guarantee that A can "hear" packets from node C.
> 
>> Sorry, could one mention why?  What's the example of this?
> 
> The simplest example (but by no means the only) is different power
> levels transmitted by A and C.

And isn't it the same for wired communications ?  (and would a potential 
solution to this to have the same power levels transmitted by A and C?)

Alex

> 
> ********************************************************************
> This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
> recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
> You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
> distribute its contents to any other person.
> ********************************************************************
> 
> 


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf