IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [BEHAVE] Home NAPT44 - How many ports?

"Reinaldo Penno (repenno)" <repenno@cisco.com> Wed, 05 June 2013 16:28 UTC

Return-Path: <repenno@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A4A821F9A87; Wed, 5 Jun 2013 09:28:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.600, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_33=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_83=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yGr-Y8p1Sl2C; Wed, 5 Jun 2013 09:28:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B1721F9B41; Wed, 5 Jun 2013 09:28:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1183; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1370449681; x=1371659281; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=OY/eyAImJt4Tl3Iu98qKlM/W50kA4qcNe27B1L9XoPg=; b=cOsft9Jeg8eigQZG+z4vKr5sBFlP8rDoE+XyOenOT2uDRUVxYa9XHGI5 kd3f27y7UHu6IWBil68uJLbVU+dIrV1xwYfZZ/Pqjo2BOwDr4xOJrjDq/ RbFvVGpHoAlLfSZqXbe3O2PIYw6gd8PlnRznsJbEjVwOjIB0ZR+QzCN7w Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhoFAP1fr1GtJXG+/2dsb2JhbABZgwkwvyx9FnSCJQEEOj8SAQgiFEIlAQEEAQ0FCBaHb707jnoxB4J6YQOof4MPgic
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,808,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="219157721"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([173.37.113.190]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Jun 2013 16:28:00 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com [173.37.183.75]) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r55GS0Xb021059 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 5 Jun 2013 16:28:00 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.77]) by xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([173.37.183.75]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Wed, 5 Jun 2013 11:27:59 -0500
From: "Reinaldo Penno (repenno)" <repenno@cisco.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [BEHAVE] Home NAPT44 - How many ports?
Thread-Index: Ac5h7Gh9xwUId/SJTdSA920KKgIqlAAA9zuwAAkCoAAAB6fzgP//zuwA
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:27:59 +0000
Message-ID: <45A697A8FFD7CF48BCF2BE7E106F0604090A0A82@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <20115.1370449415@sandelman.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.13.0.110805
x-originating-ip: [10.86.243.252]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <E214FB0714B5D14DB50E24A6CB025ADB@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "Softwires-wg list (softwires@ietf.org)" <softwires@ietf.org>, "Poscic, Kristian (Kristian)" <kristian.poscic@alcatel-lucent.com>, "behave@ietf.org" <behave@ietf.org>, "Erik Kline (ek@google.com)" <ek@google.com>, "Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] Home NAPT44 - How many ports?
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/behave>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:28:06 -0000

On 6/5/13 1:23 PM, "Michael Richardson" <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:

>
>>>>>> "repenno" == repenno  <Reinaldo> writes:
>    repenno> On the other hand, as Rajiv captured,the number of
>    repenno> UDP sessions can be much larger than the number of
>    repenno> TCP. Because the way
>    repenno> dynamic webpages are constructed today, there are sometimes
>    repenno> literally 100s
>    repenno> of DNS requests to download a single page.
>
>If one is doing CGN, wouldn't it be reasonable to point customers' at
>a recursive DNS server with an interface inside the CGN?

Yes. That's what I suggest. But some people use, say, Google's
DNS/OpenDns/etc and in some other cases the network is not setup correctly.

>
>This seems to also suggest that having a *caching* recursive DNS(SEC,
>HOMENET+, mDNS+) server inside the customer router is also a big win.

Yes, it is.

>
>-- 
>]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh
>networks [ 
>]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network
>architect  [ 
>]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails
>   [ 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email