IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

Sami Boutros <sboutros@vmware.com> Tue, 21 February 2017 19:18 UTC

Return-Path: <sboutros@vmware.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD86129C3A; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:18:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=onevmw.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hd3zmL5faeVd; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:18:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sn1nam01on0041.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.32.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3284129C80; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:18:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=onevmw.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-vmware-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=HgPEOdz2KLvFYlJbQEW/5Mx1/32uvMOMaHgRIRWLq5o=; b=efOhCbU16WOmCtWb92CtBi+oIdQWjTCHVjf7I7xjEo8U1xM/gpnW2pW+SQPVAHqK8VGDyG3NiUh/9+TaRt+4DomwhbwEnKa4eqjf5nxDU5zPFbqO7OgJf3ivjPhJtuVkRpg3gCVU5SQnpZdNgmuW+2UOwU5GN8xnfOQ5qNEh3Nk=
Received: from BN6PR05MB3009.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.173.19.15) by BN6PR05MB3011.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.173.19.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.933.7; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:18:29 +0000
Received: from BN6PR05MB3009.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.19.15]) by BN6PR05MB3009.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.19.15]) with mapi id 15.01.0933.010; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:18:30 +0000
From: Sami Boutros <sboutros@vmware.com>
To: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>, "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>, "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07
Thread-Index: AQHSd44kA2pNPLQMm0qn/KFCiMDXR6FXV1sAgBT47oCAAAMogIAHCikAgACbLSD//4CPAA==
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:18:29 +0000
Message-ID: <2E1276CF-B29B-4AC6-9799-D3475CCF53CB@vmware.com>
References: <71E62DB5-32E4-441D-9D22-290CFFC5BAD1@cisco.com> <88C160DC-F644-43D4-B538-B4568E6A0C16@vmware.com> <1B8342FC-4D33-42E5-9DF5-7CBE5BCCF86D@cisco.com> <5C8344A2-4CA8-433F-ACD4-4F71C5C32A73@cisco.com> <93624552-F50D-48BB-A666-186D550F0BEC@vmware.com> <BN6PR05MB299576CC31C93DF072109878C7510@BN6PR05MB2995.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN6PR05MB299576CC31C93DF072109878C7510@BN6PR05MB2995.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=sboutros@vmware.com;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [208.91.2.4]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 0d5e5d37-789c-40cd-cfba-08d45a8e6b69
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(22001);SRVR:BN6PR05MB3011;
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN6PR05MB3011; 7:PR1ulW5iLx3HXe4suQwxGcML6qASrtH0B5AQtJ4g2fEIZsZSPwz93cBWXz+9dH6AVQElFlmFUOOS8/OVLEXC6w/EWFW3el5Nsmx6ViDvpdPT5Je0i8B9LWzfULQ0oH7o00+tGDbqs/iFjDpA286FRsNOzGVPkaN/NPOEK8MT+sE6Jcp98Y1i6Yk1k3cewFu8Pd24M7+wUGZB9DvJF8HWiCvfYUYltwmIXsf9pbFSk83u+mC/D6P2mn/G7mNz/Witez2oOXpLfuzsIk7ma8R0nie20ng1aGkwwn02tRz0egEjg3X7olq6a6vf10EvftTesHPV69wB4WT1RTML8rqHUQ==; 20:6/rW7la64lX6ZL5XEVTSxdWNvZND8LYCswXjdykQhwiY3c/62Z56IsqVcaHGRAiiC8dgJLdWWbwwaCo3+axKLzrLX9ZrlTkYjsmn3dh1z4OcMP6YOYQXjOIzzC9pPm9pusVKrj7flcUxVvJ/5fWihSV8MtH1pg3HBGfQYPvQSMs=
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN6PR05MB3011297DDDCD59F7DA0B1ECBBE510@BN6PR05MB3011.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(138986009662008);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6041248)(20161123560025)(20161123558025)(20161123564025)(20161123562025)(20161123555025)(6072148); SRVR:BN6PR05MB3011; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN6PR05MB3011;
x-forefront-prvs: 0225B0D5BC
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(7916002)(39450400003)(24454002)(199003)(189002)(377454003)(6506006)(229853002)(102836003)(76176999)(54356999)(101416001)(50986999)(99286003)(77096006)(8666007)(25786008)(2906002)(36756003)(92566002)(68736007)(2900100001)(66066001)(8676002)(6116002)(105586002)(230783001)(33656002)(106116001)(5660300001)(1941001)(106356001)(122556002)(6436002)(3846002)(2950100002)(189998001)(93886004)(6486002)(3280700002)(38730400002)(53546006)(6246003)(54906002)(6512007)(3660700001)(97736004)(2501003)(53936002)(86362001)(81166006)(7736002)(4326007)(82746002)(305945005)(81156014)(8936002)(83716003)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BN6PR05MB3011; H:BN6PR05MB3009.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: vmware.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <F8FF8BD8E241C54B9C6475BD324FB894@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: vmware.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 Feb 2017 19:18:29.7452 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: b39138ca-3cee-4b4a-a4d6-cd83d9dd62f0
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR05MB3011
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/71GGotXXFmiYzerUrJfMqi-Q_Cw>
Cc: "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzhang@juniper.net>, "bess-chairs@ietf.org" <bess-chairs@ietf.org>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:18:37 -0000

Hi John,

I can add that the value is from 0 to 0x00ffffff, will that work?


Thanks,

Sami
On 2/21/17, 10:56 AM, "John E Drake" <jdrake@juniper.net> wrote:

>Sami,
>
>Snipped, comment inline
>
>Yours Irrespectively,
>
>John
>
>> >
>> >> Ethernet Tag ID 32-bit field MUST be set to the 24-bit VPWS service instance
>> identifier value."
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Ok, but you still didn’t mention how the 24-bit value is to be aligned in the 32-
>> bit field.  I’m guessing there will be some 0-padding, but will that the at the
>> beginning or the end?
>> >
>> 
>> I made the VPWS service instance identifier a 32-bit value in the new draft.
>> 
>
>[JD]   I don't think you can do this as there are multiple implementations that use 24 bits  
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email