Re: [bmwg] WG Adoption Call for draft-vassilev-bmwg-network-interconnect-tester-07

Gábor LENCSE <lencse@hit.bme.hu> Mon, 13 December 2021 12:09 UTC

Return-Path: <lencse@hit.bme.hu>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D85563A0818 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 04:09:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.752
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.752 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.852, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JpZuJ26Gv5MT for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 04:08:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frogstar.hit.bme.hu (frogstar.hit.bme.hu [IPv6:2001:738:2001:4020::2c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD3053A07F2 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 04:08:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.146] (host-79-121-42-244.kabelnet.hu [79.121.42.244]) (authenticated bits=0) by frogstar.hit.bme.hu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 1BDC8jwR022493 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 13:08:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lencse@hit.bme.hu)
X-Authentication-Warning: frogstar.hit.bme.hu: Host host-79-121-42-244.kabelnet.hu [79.121.42.244] claimed to be [192.168.1.146]
Message-ID: <d5c56bee-feb5-bd81-2a8a-3a0240c236a7@hit.bme.hu>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 13:08:40 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: bmwg@ietf.org
References: <SJ0PR02MB7853FC58C82D6920453D8B14D3D49@SJ0PR02MB7853.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <96e4ccd8-8148-b1d2-4eab-69476c50868f@lightside-instruments.com> <807d82a4-21a4-07b1-c89a-82b5a65119c2@lightside-instruments.com> <61B722EE.3070609@btconnect.com>
From: Gábor LENCSE <lencse@hit.bme.hu>
In-Reply-To: <61B722EE.3070609@btconnect.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.2 at frogstar.hit.bme.hu
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Received-SPF: pass (frogstar.hit.bme.hu: authenticated connection) receiver=frogstar.hit.bme.hu; client-ip=79.121.42.244; helo=[192.168.1.146]; envelope-from=lencse@hit.bme.hu; x-software=spfmilter 2.001 http://www.acme.com/software/spfmilter/ with libspf2-1.2.10;
X-DCC--Metrics: frogstar.hit.bme.hu; whitelist
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 152.66.248.44
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/9lVcKPPwu56KidNx1rKKYK5-wjs>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] WG Adoption Call for draft-vassilev-bmwg-network-interconnect-tester-07
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 12:09:02 -0000

Dear All,

To be honest, I haven't read the draft.

I just wonder, if the entire draft is about CSMA/CD. As time passes, 
Ethernet is practically used full duplex, so I think it should be of 
primary interest.

Best regards,

Gábor

12/13/2021 11:39 AM keltezéssel, t petch írta:
> I find the title of this I-D clunky and since the title is something 
> that should stay the same for the life of a document, then I think 
> that that should be changed before adoption.
>
>
> Network Interconnect Tester Management is, well , clunky.
>
> Reading the I-D it would appear to be CSMA-CD only in which case I 
> expect the title to reflect that so something like
>
> YANG Modules for the Management of CSMA-CD Network Tests.
>
> YANG Modules for the Management of CSMA-CD Network Testing.
>
> YANG Modules for the Management of Tests of CSMA-CD Networks.
>
>
> I find the Abstract likewise inappropriate but see that as something 
> that can be changed later.
>
> Tom Petch
>
>
>
>
> On 08/11/2021 15:33, Vladimir Vassilev wrote:
>>
>> On 08/11/2021 15.52, Vladimir Vassilev wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> In summary
>>>
>>> 1. Tom Petch posted an objection based on the prefixes for the
>>> traffic-analyzer and traffic-generator modules being too short. The
>>> only change in -07 addresses this concern and updates the prefixes
>>> from tg: -> nttg:, "ta:" -> "ntta:".
>>>
>>> 2. Jürgen Schönwälder provided useful input on the YANG design of the
>>> modules. Recommendations that the work group can take into account if
>>> it decides to adopt this draft.
>>
>>
>> One significant point raised by Juergen that did not have to do with the
>> design of the YANG modules that needs to be formally addressed:
>>
>>> - Why would a WG work on this and then publish the result as
>>>     Informational and not Standards Track?
>>
>> The rule of thumb is that all drafts with YANG modules have to be in the
>> Standards Track.
>>
>>
>> /Vladimir
>>
>>
>>>
>>> /Vladimir
>>>
>>>
>>> On 08/09/2021 15.35, MORTON JR., AL wrote:
>>>> BMWG:
>>>>
>>>> A WG Adoption Call for the Internet-Draft on
>>>>
>>>>        A YANG Data Model for Network Interconnect Tester Management
>>>> draft-vassilev-bmwg-network-interconnect-tester-06
>>>>
>>>> will be open from 8 September through 6 October, 2021.
>>>>
>>>> Please weigh-in on this topic by providing:
>>>>   + whether or not you believe the working group should adopt this
>>>> Internet-Draft
>>>> as a work item, for eventual publication as an Informational RFC.
>>>> + your current comments on the draft from your adoption call review
>>>> (recent comments on the list should be referenced).
>>>> + whether or not you are willing to review new versions of the draft
>>>> during
>>>> development.
>>>>
>>>> Send your comments to this list @bmwg@ietf.org
>>>>
>>>> A URL for this Internet-Draft is [0]
>>>>
>>>> Al
>>>> bmwg co-chair
>>>>
>>>> [0]
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-vassilev-bmwg-network-interconnect-tester-06.txt 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> bmwg mailing list
>>>> bmwg@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> bmwg mailing list
>>> bmwg@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bmwg mailing list
>> bmwg@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
>
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> bmwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
>