Re: [bmwg] WG Adoption Call for draft-vassilev-bmwg-network-interconnect-tester-06

Vladimir wrote:
> Juergen wrote:
> > - Why would a WG work on this and then publish the result as
> >     Informational and not Standards Track?
> 
> The rule of thumb is that all drafts with YANG modules have to be in the
> Standards Track.

This specific question is a note I added to the agenda, to be sure we cover it today!
Al

> -----Original Message-----
> From: bmwg <bmwg-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Vladimir Vassilev
> Sent: Monday, November 8, 2021 10:34 AM
> To: bmwg@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [bmwg] WG Adoption Call for draft-vassilev-bmwg-network-
> interconnect-tester-06
> 
> 
> On 08/11/2021 15.52, Vladimir Vassilev wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In summary
> >
> > 1. Tom Petch posted an objection based on the prefixes for the
> > traffic-analyzer and traffic-generator modules being too short. The
> > only change in -07 addresses this concern and updates the prefixes
> > from tg: -> nttg:, "ta:" -> "ntta:".
> >
> > 2. Jürgen Schönwälder provided useful input on the YANG design of the
> > modules. Recommendations that the work group can take into account if
> > it decides to adopt this draft.
> 
> 
> One significant point raised by Juergen that did not have to do with the
> design of the YANG modules that needs to be formally addressed:
> 
> > - Why would a WG work on this and then publish the result as
> >     Informational and not Standards Track?
> 
> The rule of thumb is that all drafts with YANG modules have to be in the
> Standards Track.
> 
> 
> /Vladimir
> 
> 
> >
> > /Vladimir
> >
> >
> > On 08/09/2021 15.35, MORTON JR., AL wrote:
> >> BMWG:
> >>
> >> A WG Adoption Call for the Internet-Draft on
> >>
> >>        A YANG Data Model for Network Interconnect Tester Management
> >>             draft-vassilev-bmwg-network-interconnect-tester-06
> >>
> >> will be open from 8 September through 6 October, 2021.
> >>
> >> Please weigh-in on this topic by providing:
> >>   + whether or not you believe the working group should adopt this
> >> Internet-Draft
> >> as a work item, for eventual publication as an Informational RFC.
> >> + your current comments on the draft from your adoption call review
> >> (recent comments on the list should be referenced).
> >> + whether or not you are willing to review new versions of the draft
> >> during
> >> development.
> >>
> >> Send your comments to this list @bmwg@ietf.org
> >>
> >> A URL for this Internet-Draft is [0]
> >>
> >> Al
> >> bmwg co-chair
> >>
> >> [0]
> >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-
> vassilev-bmwg-network-interconnect-tester-
> 06.txt__;!!BhdT!01yuvsxhl4fuBh16EnIrFuTekyydOHAgnIKubbS-e2KAJYw6bYUo-A_xg_Kg$
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> bmwg mailing list
> >> bmwg@ietf.org
> >>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg__;!!Bhd
> T!01yuvsxhl4fuBh16EnIrFuTekyydOHAgnIKubbS-e2KAJYw6bYUo-OyfJCkP$
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > bmwg mailing list
> > bmwg@ietf.org
> >
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg__;!!Bhd
> T!01yuvsxhl4fuBh16EnIrFuTekyydOHAgnIKubbS-e2KAJYw6bYUo-OyfJCkP$
> 
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> bmwg@ietf.org
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg__;!!Bhd
> T!01yuvsxhl4fuBh16EnIrFuTekyydOHAgnIKubbS-e2KAJYw6bYUo-OyfJCkP$