Re: [bmwg] WG Adoption Call for draft-vassilev-bmwg-network-interconnect-tester-07

[t petch <[e-mail]>]

On 13/12/2021 12:08, Gábor LENCSE wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> To be honest, I haven't read the draft.
>
> I just wonder, if the entire draft is about CSMA/CD. As time passes,
> Ethernet is practically used full duplex, so I think it should be of
> primary interest.

This is two YANG modules and the import of them is conditional on the 
interface being of type ethernetCsmacd as specified in RFC3635.  As it 
stands, the title suggests that this I-D is applicable everywhere, X.25, 
token ring etc which I think misleading.  In the context of YANG 
modules, which is what this I-D is all about, then I think Csmacd or 
ethernetCsmacd is accurate.

Tom Petch

> Best regards,
>
> Gábor
>
> 12/13/2021 11:39 AM keltezéssel, t petch írta:
>> I find the title of this I-D clunky and since the title is something
>> that should stay the same for the life of a document, then I think
>> that that should be changed before adoption.
>>
>>
>> Network Interconnect Tester Management is, well , clunky.
>>
>> Reading the I-D it would appear to be CSMA-CD only in which case I
>> expect the title to reflect that so something like
>>
>> YANG Modules for the Management of CSMA-CD Network Tests.
>>
>> YANG Modules for the Management of CSMA-CD Network Testing.
>>
>> YANG Modules for the Management of Tests of CSMA-CD Networks.
>>
>>
>> I find the Abstract likewise inappropriate but see that as something
>> that can be changed later.
>>
>> Tom Petch
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 08/11/2021 15:33, Vladimir Vassilev wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/11/2021 15.52, Vladimir Vassilev wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> In summary
>>>>
>>>> 1. Tom Petch posted an objection based on the prefixes for the
>>>> traffic-analyzer and traffic-generator modules being too short. The
>>>> only change in -07 addresses this concern and updates the prefixes
>>>> from tg: -> nttg:, "ta:" -> "ntta:".
>>>>
>>>> 2. Jürgen Schönwälder provided useful input on the YANG design of the
>>>> modules. Recommendations that the work group can take into account if
>>>> it decides to adopt this draft.
>>>
>>>
>>> One significant point raised by Juergen that did not have to do with the
>>> design of the YANG modules that needs to be formally addressed:
>>>
>>>> - Why would a WG work on this and then publish the result as
>>>>     Informational and not Standards Track?
>>>
>>> The rule of thumb is that all drafts with YANG modules have to be in the
>>> Standards Track.
>>>
>>>
>>> /Vladimir
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> /Vladimir
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 08/09/2021 15.35, MORTON JR., AL wrote:
>>>>> BMWG:
>>>>>
>>>>> A WG Adoption Call for the Internet-Draft on
>>>>>
>>>>>        A YANG Data Model for Network Interconnect Tester Management
>>>>> draft-vassilev-bmwg-network-interconnect-tester-06
>>>>>
>>>>> will be open from 8 September through 6 October, 2021.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please weigh-in on this topic by providing:
>>>>>   + whether or not you believe the working group should adopt this
>>>>> Internet-Draft
>>>>> as a work item, for eventual publication as an Informational RFC.
>>>>> + your current comments on the draft from your adoption call review
>>>>> (recent comments on the list should be referenced).
>>>>> + whether or not you are willing to review new versions of the draft
>>>>> during
>>>>> development.
>>>>>
>>>>> Send your comments to this list @[e-mail]
>>>>>
>>>>> A URL for this Internet-Draft is [0]
>>>>>
>>>>> Al
>>>>> bmwg co-chair
>>>>>
>>>>> [0]
>>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-vassilev-bmwg-network-interconnect-tester-06.txt
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> bmwg mailing list
>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> bmwg mailing list
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> bmwg mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bmwg mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg