Re: [bmwg] WG Adoption Call for draft-vassilev-bmwg-network-interconnect-tester-07

[t petch <[e-mail]>]

I find the title of this I-D clunky and since the title is something 
that should stay the same for the life of a document, then I think that 
that should be changed before adoption.


Network Interconnect Tester Management is, well , clunky.

Reading the I-D it would appear to be CSMA-CD only in which case I 
expect the title to reflect that so something like

YANG Modules for the Management of CSMA-CD Network Tests.

YANG Modules for the Management of CSMA-CD Network Testing.

YANG Modules for the Management of Tests of CSMA-CD Networks.


I find the Abstract likewise inappropriate but see that as something 
that can be changed later.

Tom Petch




On 08/11/2021 15:33, Vladimir Vassilev wrote:
>
> On 08/11/2021 15.52, Vladimir Vassilev wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In summary
>>
>> 1. Tom Petch posted an objection based on the prefixes for the
>> traffic-analyzer and traffic-generator modules being too short. The
>> only change in -07 addresses this concern and updates the prefixes
>> from tg: -> nttg:, "ta:" -> "ntta:".
>>
>> 2. Jürgen Schönwälder provided useful input on the YANG design of the
>> modules. Recommendations that the work group can take into account if
>> it decides to adopt this draft.
>
>
> One significant point raised by Juergen that did not have to do with the
> design of the YANG modules that needs to be formally addressed:
>
>> - Why would a WG work on this and then publish the result as
>>     Informational and not Standards Track?
>
> The rule of thumb is that all drafts with YANG modules have to be in the
> Standards Track.
>
>
> /Vladimir
>
>
>>
>> /Vladimir
>>
>>
>> On 08/09/2021 15.35, MORTON JR., AL wrote:
>>> BMWG:
>>>
>>> A WG Adoption Call for the Internet-Draft on
>>>
>>>        A YANG Data Model for Network Interconnect Tester Management
>>>             draft-vassilev-bmwg-network-interconnect-tester-06
>>>
>>> will be open from 8 September through 6 October, 2021.
>>>
>>> Please weigh-in on this topic by providing:
>>>   + whether or not you believe the working group should adopt this
>>> Internet-Draft
>>> as a work item, for eventual publication as an Informational RFC.
>>> + your current comments on the draft from your adoption call review
>>> (recent comments on the list should be referenced).
>>> + whether or not you are willing to review new versions of the draft
>>> during
>>> development.
>>>
>>> Send your comments to this list @[e-mail]
>>>
>>> A URL for this Internet-Draft is [0]
>>>
>>> Al
>>> bmwg co-chair
>>>
>>> [0]
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-vassilev-bmwg-network-interconnect-tester-06.txt
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> bmwg mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bmwg mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
>
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg