IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-03 and call for sheperd

"Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com> Wed, 20 May 2015 15:07 UTC

Return-Path: <mhartley@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7521A1B7D for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 May 2015 08:07:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SUDQAoe09gZ3 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 May 2015 08:07:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C0601A1B29 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 May 2015 08:07:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8988; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1432134436; x=1433344036; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=mLnxX0hxs77JvE1rizCkuzoCEba5Xx/PDAN9q+0Yr0A=; b=jX5v2zof+ALi4oSu8uvS3eeJ/1xEO1NJU+fuVXQFm4yzsj5fKRknsfKG wdh3iR/XyE9Nq3OsJGEXNjqeq4YWNezxReoovRBb0sQn/fzrz/+pntUQm IA5Ksqj9130tuH9vnL1rSLteLzOn04/JWtSeGX+RNXVVf2Xu8kGFbmr1u g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AZBQDcoVxV/4sNJK1cgkVLVGTMUQKBOUwBAQEBAQGBC4QjAQEEHRBMEAIBCCIkMiUCBAENDYgkzU0BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXizqEVDEHgxeBFgWLeYQ7gjyiFCNhgSkcFYE9gjWBAQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,464,1427760000"; d="scan'208,217";a="421257000"
Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 May 2015 15:07:15 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com [173.36.12.79]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t4KF7EfR018059 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 20 May 2015 15:07:14 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([169.254.7.100]) by xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com ([173.36.12.79]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 20 May 2015 10:07:14 -0500
From: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com>
To: Ramon Casellas <ramon.casellas@cttc.es>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-03 and call for sheperd
Thread-Index: AQHQj0kbRbr+LifYa0qF5OmSNlKil52BvRQAgANAKmA=
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 15:07:13 +0000
Message-ID: <9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC29CA28E0@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com>
References: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48128F2479@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> <55564F37.7010203@labn.net> <5559A180.8090504@cttc.es>
In-Reply-To: <5559A180.8090504@cttc.es>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [161.44.213.59]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC29CA28E0xmbrcdx03ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/8kevIxB129YWIQhYqIHlzwQxk_0>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-03 and call for sheperd
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 15:07:23 -0000

Ramon,

A couple more things.

Is this doc informational or standards-track? It claims to be informational, but it has RFC 2119 language in it.

Also, it's missing the standard boilerplate for this stuff:

      The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL
      NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED",  "MAY", and
      "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
      RFC 2119.

Should that be added?

Also: you currently have six main authors, and my understanding is that the RFC Editor's guidelines are that there should be no more than five....

Cheers

Matt

El 15/05/2015 a las 21:55, Lou Berger escribió:
All,
    I believe there has been sufficient time and support to indicate that this document is ready to move forward, i.e., as "consensus caller" I believe there is WG consensus behind publishing the document.  That said, there were a few comments that were received during and (per Ramon) after Monday.  I'd expect the authors to work with those making the comments, the WG, and the document Shepherd (who, per normal process, does the actual publication request) to ensure that the comments are addressed.
Dear Lou, all

Version -04 has been uploaded with all comments received so far.

Thanks
Ramon

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email