Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-03 and call for sheperd
Ramon Casellas <ramon.casellas@cttc.es> Wed, 20 May 2015 17:06 UTC
Return-Path: <ramon.casellas@cttc.es>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A488E1A88C2 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 May 2015 10:06:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.801
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.801 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xaY2V6pfvXBn for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 May 2015 10:06:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from villa.puc.rediris.es (villa.puc.rediris.es [IPv6:2001:720:418:ca00::7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8ED721A890B for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 May 2015 10:06:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [84.88.62.208] (helo=leo) by villa.puc.rediris.es with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ramon.casellas@cttc.es>) id 1Yv7SF-00056J-NE; Wed, 20 May 2015 19:06:53 +0200
Received: from [192.168.1.200] (81.61.180.55.dyn.user.ono.com [81.61.180.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by leo (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5753E1FEA7; Wed, 20 May 2015 19:06:47 +0200 (CEST)
X-Envelope-From: ramon.casellas@cttc.es
Message-ID: <555CBF29.3070305@cttc.es>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 19:06:49 +0200
From: Ramon Casellas <ramon.casellas@cttc.es>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
References: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48128F2479@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> <55564F37.7010203@labn.net> <5559A180.8090504@cttc.es> <9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC29CA28E0@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC29CA28E0@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080100010700040301060804"
X-Spamina-Bogosity: Unsure
X-Spamina-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--)
X-Spamina-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-2.9 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0090] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/EnNsOhVLMNuRWZOkGQ3NDs7canE>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-03 and call for sheperd
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 17:06:59 -0000
Dear Matt, Please see inline El 20/05/2015 a las 17:07, Matt Hartley (mhartley) escribió: > > Ramon, > > Is this doc informational or standards-track? It claims to be > informational, but it has RFC 2119 language in it. It is a good question, which has been popping frequently during the lifetime of the draft. The last indication I received (internally) was that it should be informational, and I changed it. I guess the problem is that as a fwk document is mainly informational, but at some point in the distant past, it was decided to include also control plane requirements (I guess those are the sections that use RFC 2119 language). Maybe wiser people can comment on this, but it was my (admittedly limited) understanding that those are non-exclusive (i.e., RFCs may be informational but yet define requirements and use RFC2119 language to indicate requirement levels, adding the appropriate boilerplate). Also, it’s missing the standard boilerplate for this stuff: Uhm, afaik, it is not (I just checked both in -03 and -04 and the boilerplate is there $2.1). The change standards track -> informational happened in -04. In any case, no objection either way. I will proceed with whatever option is more appropriate > Also: you currently have six main authors, and my understanding is > that the RFC Editor’s guidelines are that there should be no more than > five…. > Thanks for pointing this out, we were told of this not so long ago,... I would like to ask whether five is a rigid limit and whether exceptions may be granted (consider this a not-so-subtle request for exception...), given that this draft was the result of merging several drafts -- which explains the amazingly long list of contributors -- and authorship was a quite hard thing to agree on. OTOH I guess that if this policy really needs to be enforced, we will have to find a way (hopefully not involving dice) Thanks for your feedback Ramon
- [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-gr… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… Matt Hartley (mhartley)
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… Zhangxian (Xian)
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… Matt Hartley (mhartley)
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… Ramon Casellas
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… Matt Hartley (mhartley)
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… Ramon Casellas
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… Jonas Mårtensson
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… Ramon Casellas
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… Jonas Mårtensson
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… Ramon Casellas
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… Jonas Mårtensson
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… Ramon Casellas
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… Matt Hartley (mhartley)
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… Ramon Casellas
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… Matt Hartley (mhartley)
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… Ramon Casellas
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… Zhangxian (Xian)
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… Fatai Zhang
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flex… Ramon Casellas