Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-03 and call for sheperd

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Fri, 15 May 2015 19:55 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E9F1A8860 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 May 2015 12:55:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.233
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.233 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rEjv0FZvBD-9 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 May 2015 12:55:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.18.3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A86001A884D for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 May 2015 12:55:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 931 invoked by uid 0); 15 May 2015 19:55:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw4) (10.0.90.85) by gproxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 15 May 2015 19:55:33 -0000
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw4 with id URod1q00N2SSUrH01Rogr8; Fri, 15 May 2015 19:48:40 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=D8zUdJhj c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=SY9aFQKHIdAA:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=h1PgugrvaO0A:10 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=9iDbn-4jx3cA:10 a=cKsnjEOsciEA:10 a=gZbpxnkM3yUA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=RUgz4n3fVVhXmBK3xcUA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=nTHCoUExaRkA:10 a=t9MFvKAEumoA:10 a=OhvvrwSMIqG0-J2YR-0A:9 a=uAH0aYtwcIdC-xXv:21 a=UiCQ7L4-1S4A:10 a=hTZeC7Yk6K0A:10 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=frz4AuCg-hUA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=FkYF5HTSDarXTYwDC4uZG9XG0imx/FLl9IcfY2ErfOc=; b=IFkNK2TPhcjLmgYgtNG0OGBzHkmAK4l++KxB6dLS4Ls1aIozVIw+lgxJJkiaWoDtA5mnWZzFxVxzu1aeqxPA98yTttJJ8oS1t1i3O9p6VBG3Xq7VBEHMZOR2n6V8Jj9F;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:55876 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1YtLi0-0002PL-0x; Fri, 15 May 2015 13:55:48 -0600
Message-ID: <55564F37.7010203@labn.net>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 15:55:35 -0400
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)" <ccamp@ietf.org>
References: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48128F2479@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48128F2479@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020509080206000005030600"
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/sKA_AI1tPdbunKNvGQHdkdecvX8>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-03 and call for sheperd
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 19:55:53 -0000

All,
    I believe there has been sufficient time and support to indicate
that this document is ready to move forward, i.e., as "consensus caller"
I believe there is WG consensus behind publishing the document.  That
said, there were a few comments that were received during and (per
Ramon) after Monday.  I'd expect the authors to work with those making
the comments, the WG, and the document Shepherd (who, per normal
process, does the actual publication request) to ensure that the
comments are addressed.

Lou

On 4/27/2015 6:04 AM, Daniele Ceccarelli wrote:
>
> Working group,
>
>  
>
> this starts a two weeks working group last call on
> draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-03.
>
> The last call end on Monday May 11^th . Please send you comments to
> the CCAMP mailing list.
>
>  
>
> All the IPR declarations from authors and contributors have been
> collected and can be found in the history of the document:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk/history/
>
> Please note that no IPR was disclosed against this draft.
>
>  
>
> *_PLEASE NOTE_*
>
> 1.       Since both the chairs and the secretary are involved in the
> draft as co-authors, the consensus will be called by Lou.
>
> 2.       This is a good opportunity to have the WG involved also in
> the Post-WG Last call process nominating a document shepherd which is
> not one of the chairs or the secretary. The document shepherd:
>
> a.       MUST NOT be one of the authors/contributors of the draft
>
> b.      SHOULD be an expert of the ID subject
>
> c.       Will receive all the needed support from the chairs.
>
>  
>
> Further details on the shepherd duties can be found in RFC4858 and at
> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/document-shepherds.html:
>
> Please volunteer if interested
>
>  
>
> Thanks
>
> Daniele & Fatai
>