Re: [CCAMP] [inventory-yang] poll for network inventory base model

"Wubo (lana)" <lana.wubo@huawei.com> Tue, 05 September 2023 13:02 UTC

Return-Path: <lana.wubo@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B23C14CE42; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 06:02:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qHmYN99L11TQ; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 06:02:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F380AC14F73E; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 06:02:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrpeml100001.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.200]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Rg5Jd53mnz6K6Zv; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 21:02:41 +0800 (CST)
Received: from kwepemd200001.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.2) by lhrpeml100001.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.183) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.31; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 14:02:48 +0100
Received: from kwepemd500002.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.104) by kwepemd200001.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.2) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1258.23; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 21:02:46 +0800
Received: from kwepemd500002.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.104]) by kwepemd500002.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.104]) with mapi id 15.02.1258.023; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 21:02:46 +0800
From: "Wubo (lana)" <lana.wubo@huawei.com>
To: "maqiufang (A)" <maqiufang1=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "inventory-yang@ietf.org" <inventory-yang@ietf.org>
CC: "ivy-chairs@ietf.org" <ivy-chairs@ietf.org>, opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [inventory-yang] poll for network inventory base model
Thread-Index: AdnZd2aurH+3TSP/QE69JhEVg4aB+QGgIMkQ
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2023 13:02:46 +0000
Message-ID: <a5ce29b4ee2442df92be1925df647669@huawei.com>
References: <7c4effcc6c5d43a6a7ddc4735d370272@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <7c4effcc6c5d43a6a7ddc4735d370272@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.136.114.167]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_a5ce29b4ee2442df92be1925df647669huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/w6ksCUnjB3KAaFZ2f9HqRmyjcCo>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] [inventory-yang] poll for network inventory base model
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2023 13:02:53 -0000

Hi Qiufang, Daniele, all,

I voted for option 3. As I read the whole draft of option 1, the content is very hardware-centric. I think the attributes of physical and virtual devices, or the attributes of software and hardware components, are quite common and can be shared rather than augmentation.

I believe the inventory base model is a generic model, not limited to hardware inventory.

Thanks,
Bo Wu

From: Inventory-yang <inventory-yang-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of maqiufang (A)
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 2:22 PM
To: inventory-yang@ietf.org
Cc: ivy-chairs@ietf.org; opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>; ccamp@ietf.org
Subject: [Inventory-yang] [inventory-yang] poll for network inventory base model

Hi Working Group,

It's now time to start considering how to move forward with the inventory base model. We have two different documents that could be used as a starting point for our work or, in case the working group believes none of them is "good enough", we can start a brand new ID.
In case the latter option is chosen, Daniele and I will write a -00 version including just the table of content and what we'd like to be covered in each section. The document will then be handed over to a pool of authors which will bring it till the WG adoption.

Hence, we will have a 3 weeks polling starting today. We decided to make it a bit longer than usual because this time the working group is requested to review two drafts instead of one.

This mail starts a 3 weeks polling, terminating on September 15th,  where we would like the working group to express your preference among:

1.       Adopt  draft-ietf-ccamp-network-inventory-yang-02 in IVY and evolve it to become the network inventory base model
2.       Adopt draft-wzwb-opsawg-network-inventory-management-03 in IVY and evolve it to become the network inventory base model
3.       Start a brand new document from scratch as described above

In the week after the closure of the polling (between September 18 and 25) we will have an IVY interim meeting to discuss the issues/concerns raised during the polling ( A separate mail will be sent).

Thank you,

Qiufang and Daniele