Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG
"Max Pritikin (pritikin)" <pritikin@cisco.com> Wed, 08 January 2014 16:30 UTC
Return-Path: <pritikin@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF261ADFA2 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 08:30:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.039
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.039 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mpP5CIqEuv2P for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 08:30:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1741ADF66 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 08:30:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1422; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1389198594; x=1390408194; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=6DBxeL+lKPDR2SQSsHv10CarXMuR9XkxzOmwz4F3dBE=; b=iNSAZecdnf9THL9ljQ7LDrk8zJoP34LYpaljVEwAyCJMtq0PdKwrdZFf t0C7fiCLSdHwH3+KBta+nrFS2t0iQDLUCd33BkuqMKu6W3NKKREdxDfL5 09ZwwUlMtYgo0Nu1f7Um5AyrNqzmSUxw+YTCr5nuTv6IiURgUp7leVMi6 c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AisFAMB8zVKtJXHB/2dsb2JhbABZgwuBDrkygRQWdIIlAQEBAwF5EAIBCEYyJQIEDgWHfAjFABeOUjMHgySBEwEDmBeSFYMtgio
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,625,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="296066907"
Received: from rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com ([173.37.113.193]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Jan 2014 16:29:53 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com [173.37.183.89]) by rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s08GTr4e012812 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 8 Jan 2014 16:29:53 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([169.254.7.72]) by xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com ([173.37.183.89]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 10:29:53 -0600
From: "Max Pritikin (pritikin)" <pritikin@cisco.com>
To: Sean Turner <TurnerS@ieca.com>
Thread-Topic: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG
Thread-Index: AQHPCOZ5ilotVn8nX0GDP1xk3l6DPZp00MIAgAJsvICAAVI3AIAAI3sAgAHTHICAAJDCgIAASJcAgAAQ2QA=
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 16:29:52 +0000
Message-ID: <9C2B5932-1214-4D46-B042-EF95EC8E4188@cisco.com>
References: <52C755AA.70200@cisco.com> <CEED2882.2B867%paul@marvell.com> <52C9F739.1020301@cisco.com> <7BAC95F5A7E67643AAFB2C31BEE662D018B7D6E094@SC-VEXCH2.marvell.com> <52CB30B4.9090206@cs.tcd.ie> <91BE5B4B-AE45-4C05-A423-EDF744A54766@cisco.com> <52CD31F9.4030302@cs.tcd.ie> <491C2306-0FB5-4EA8-B918-C20B75767D4D@ieca.com>
In-Reply-To: <491C2306-0FB5-4EA8-B918-C20B75767D4D@ieca.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.21.0.25]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <02E723D13491AA438868C1A70ABA9761@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "David McGrew (mcgrew)" <mcgrew@cisco.com>, "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 16:30:04 -0000
re: X509 PKI update discussion We can (and probably will) quibble about the details in an other forum than CFRG. I'll watch for the conversation and am pleased to know Sean is keeping a list. On Jan 8, 2014, at 8:29 AM, Sean Turner <TurnerS@ieca.com> wrote: >> >> Again though, I don't think thrashing out the pros and cons >> of X.509 on this list is a good plan. Fair enough, the conversation steered that way but I'm happy to move to an alternate location. The discussion started here is a good one. With DICE requiring DTLS and w TLS 1.3 ongoing the timing might be right. >> Better would be for a >> bunch of really-interested parties to go into a huddle and >> come up with a worked out proposal. (But if a bunch of >> semi-interested parties ask for a new list to talk about >> this, I've no problem helping that happen, though wouldn't >> be very hopeful of a useful outcome.) > > I’m keeping list now :) > > spt I'm tentatively in agreement with much of the discussion so far. Particularly regarding the various and multiple principle name issues. I'd like to add though that "PKI" includes more than just the "global internet" use case that has been much discussed. A valid use case we also need to consider involves enterprise specific key infrastructures. I'll watch for the continued conversation elsewhere. Cheers, - max
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG Trevor Perrin
- [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG Sean Turner
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG Henrick Hellström
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG David Wagner
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG Henrick Hellström
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG Henrick Hellström
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG Paul Lambert
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG Paul Lambert
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG William Whyte
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG Paul Lambert
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG Dan Brown
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG Blumenthal, Uri - 0558 - MITLL
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG Paul Lambert
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG William Whyte
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG Max Pritikin (pritikin)
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG Sean Turner
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG Sean Turner
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG Adam Back
- [Cfrg] QKD is pointless (was: Re: considering new… David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Cfrg] QKD is pointless (was: Re: considering… Paterson, Kenny
- Re: [Cfrg] QKD is pointless (was: Re: considering… Sean Turner
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG Sean Turner
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG Max Pritikin (pritikin)
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG Dan Brown
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG Paul Lambert
- Re: [Cfrg] QKD is pointless (was: Re: considering… Igoe, Kevin M.
- Re: [Cfrg] QKD is pointless (was: Re: considering… Igoe, Kevin M.
- Re: [Cfrg] QKD is pointless (was: Re: considering… Watson Ladd
- [Cfrg] DANE in the IETF (was: Re: considering new… Paul Hoffman
- [Cfrg] One Key -> RE: considering new topics for … Paul Lambert
- Re: [Cfrg] QKD is pointless (was: Re: considering… Paul Lambert
- [Cfrg] ReL DANE in the IETF (was: Re: considering… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Cfrg] QKD is pointless David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] QKD is pointless Hilarie Orman
- [Cfrg] likelihood that someone has a quantum comp… David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG dan
- Re: [Cfrg] likelihood that someone has a quantum … David Jacobson
- Re: [Cfrg] likelihood that someone has a quantum … William Whyte
- Re: [Cfrg] likelihood that someone has a quantum … Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] likelihood that someone has a quantum … Yoav Nir
- Re: [Cfrg] likelihood that someone has a quantum … Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Cfrg] likelihood that someone has a quantum … William Whyte
- Re: [Cfrg] likelihood that someone has a quantum … David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] likelihood that someone has a quantum … David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] likelihood that someone has a quantum … William Whyte
- Re: [Cfrg] likelihood that someone has a quantum … arne renkema-padmos
- Re: [Cfrg] likelihood that someone has a quantum … Igoe, Kevin M.
- Re: [Cfrg] QKD is pointless David Wagner
- Re: [Cfrg] likelihood that someone has a quantum … William Whyte
- Re: [Cfrg] likelihood that someone has a quantum … William Whyte
- Re: [Cfrg] likelihood that someone has a quantum … William Whyte
- Re: [Cfrg] likelihood that someone has a quantum … David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] likelihood that someone has a quantum … arne renkema-padmos
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG Paul Lambert
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG Igoe, Kevin M.
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG Paul Lambert
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG David McGrew
- [Cfrg] 'key centric' architecture (was: Re: consi… Rene Struik
- Re: [Cfrg] 'key centric' architecture (was: Re: c… Richard Barnes
- Re: [Cfrg] considering new topics for CFRG David McGrew