Re: [Cfrg] Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred curves around 256bit work factor (ends on March 3rd)

"Dan Harkins" <dharkins@lounge.org> Thu, 26 February 2015 17:30 UTC

Return-Path: <dharkins@lounge.org>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 638C11A9105 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 09:30:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.867
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.867 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fw1Em9_nDugz for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 09:30:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from colo.trepanning.net (colo.trepanning.net [69.55.226.174]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70BBA1A874B for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 09:30:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from www.trepanning.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colo.trepanning.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F08FA888132; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 09:30:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 69.12.173.8 (SquirrelMail authenticated user dharkins@lounge.org) by www.trepanning.net with HTTP; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 09:30:48 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <7e1d3742e6c11679e5d17aa0a73a66c3.squirrel@www.trepanning.net>
In-Reply-To: <54EDDBEE.5060904@isode.com>
References: <54EDDBEE.5060904@isode.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 09:30:48 -0800 (PST)
From: "Dan Harkins" <dharkins@lounge.org>
To: "Alexey Melnikov" <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.14 [SVN]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/iwiVvShBDwDNoSDgSL946YMsjx4>
Cc: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred curves around 256bit work factor (ends on March 3rd)
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 17:30:49 -0000


On Wed, February 25, 2015 6:27 am, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> CFRG chairs are starting another poll:
>
> Q3: This is a Quaker poll (please answer one of "preferred",
> "acceptable" or "no") for each curve specified below:
>
> 1) 448 (Goldilocks)
> 2) 480
> 3) 521
> 4) other curve (please name another curve that you "prefer" or "accept",
> or state "no")

1) no
2) no
3) preferred
4) no

  Dan.